It is currently Thu Apr 18, 2024 1:33 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Port Jervis Equipment Troubles
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2021 7:57 pm 

Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 5:49 pm
Posts: 25
Looks like the rest of Jimmy Wilsons equipment is in trouble, hopefully the museum that is starting up gets it and makes something of it. The E8 and passenger cars have sat in Port Jervis since 2006, with no obvious plans for any of it and no work done on them. Lesson once again is, Own your land!

More info in the article below.

https://www.recordonline.com/story/news ... 9z9QMjqFsQ


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Port Jervis Equipment Troubles
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2021 10:18 pm 

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:27 pm
Posts: 118
If I remember correctly the Erie 833 was running and was towed to Streamliners at Spencer several years ago. It was one of the E8's used by Conrail.

Alan


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Port Jervis Equipment Troubles
PostPosted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 8:25 am 

Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 1:37 pm
Posts: 2230
Am I the only one who detects 'the other shoe dropping' on Eric Strohmeyer's cryptic post here a couple of weeks ago?

833 was Conrail 4022 for a while, running on the executive train, and was Bennett Levin's for s while before being resold to NY≷ as he posts here he may want to comment on the unit's history. The last picture on railpictures.net (upload-dated 6/18) shows it nose-on, on the turntable at Port Jervis, a bit scruffy and bird-struck looking.

I clearly remember this unit being used in commuter service on the Pascack Valley line in the early 1970s -- which may say more about my memory than where the unit actually worked -- but that was well before Conrail, in the era the push-pull and U34CH sets were still being delivered, and many of the trains were still RS3s and Stillwells. (If I recall correctly, the train behind the E8s was composed of 1937-era ATSF coaches, almost more of a thrill than the locomotives!) I can find no indication when, or indeed if, Conrail might have transferred the unit west, first for the Youngstown service and then, IIRC, used on the Vopo (Valparaiso) trains even further west.

_________________
R.M.Ellsworth


Last edited by Overmod on Sat Jan 23, 2021 1:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Port Jervis Equipment Troubles
PostPosted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 12:56 pm 

Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 4:02 pm
Posts: 1745
Location: Back in NE Ohio
Reading 900 wrote:
If I remember correctly the Erie 833 was running and was towed to Streamliners at Spencer several years ago. It was one of the E8's used by Conrail.

Alan


ex-EL #833 was the last locomotive assigned to the Cleveland-Youngstown commuter train, which ended in January of 1977. So, somewhat significant. I was on that trip.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Port Jervis Equipment Troubles
PostPosted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 5:43 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 129
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Juniata Terminal purchased former Conrail 4021 & 4022 from CSXT in 2001 with the overall goal of reuniting 4021 with CR 4020 (PRR 5809) previously purchased from Norfolk Southern.

We never any concrete plan on what to do with 4022 other than to store it properly and prevent as much deterioration as possible. Of the three CR OCS E8's the 4022 was not heavily upgraded electrically like its sisters were, but it had the best engines which were culled out of former Reading re-engined Baldwins. If I recall my Dad and I offered the Erie Lackawanna Dining Car group the chance to purchase it prior to being contacted by NY&GL.

I was last on the 4022 down in Spencer. An NS Road Foreman asked me to look at it when it would not load. It was running on #2 engine with #1 engine tagged down with internal water leaks...Nothing was in the condition it was when it left Juniata Terminal back in 2006.

Talk about sellers remorse....

Eric Levin


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Port Jervis Equipment Troubles
PostPosted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 6:31 pm 

Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 4:18 pm
Posts: 540
Location: Illinois
Can anyone post a roster of what equipment in Port Jervis is involved in this?


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Port Jervis Equipment Troubles
PostPosted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 9:43 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 1016
Location: NJ
What are the plans for the RS-3?


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Port Jervis Equipment Troubles
PostPosted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:48 pm 

Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 4:08 pm
Posts: 45
ctjacks wrote:
Can anyone post a roster of what equipment in Port Jervis is involved in this?


Locomotive Wise:
EMD E8A 833 - NYGL (Erie), CR 4022, EL/Erie 833
ALCo RS3 935 - NYGL, ex-D&H 4085

Coaches
NYGL Buisness Car 3 “Pride of The Delaware" - ex-CN 15100 Dynamometer Car
NYGL Chestnut Hill - (ex-PV 800272, exx-VIA/CN 2083 Riviere Rough, nee-NYC 10174 St. Regis River)
NYGL 950 - (ex-OHRY/LS, exx-WICT 7802 Iowa River, exx-IAIS 7802 Iowa River, nee-C&NW 7802) LW cafe - lounge.
NYGL 2995 - (ex-OHRY/LS, exx-WICT 2625 Silver River, exx-IAIS 2625 Silver River, nee-IC 2625) LW 56-seat coach converted to table car.
NYGL 536 “The Crescent” - (ex-WMSR, exx-NS 843, nee-SOU) PS LW 52-seat coach

(Coach info from Pass car Photo Index)

_________________
-DeAndre W.
(MTA) Metro North Railroad - MofE
Adirondack Volunteer Conductor/Engineer/Mechanical
SUNY Polytechnic Institute Alumni


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Port Jervis Equipment Troubles
PostPosted: Sun Jan 24, 2021 12:35 pm 

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:07 pm
Posts: 1116
Location: B'more Maryland
Sure sounds like a "I messed up and don't like consequences" situation.

_________________
If you fear the future you won't have one.
The past was the worst.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Port Jervis Equipment Troubles
PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2021 12:18 am 

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2017 8:42 am
Posts: 68
Location: Either behind my desk or on my phone
Overmod wrote:
Am I the only one who detects 'the other shoe dropping' on Eric Strohmeyer's cryptic post here a couple of weeks ago?


Not at all, except that I don't think this shoe fell off of the same corpse. As I understand it there are two discrete sets of 'NY&GL" equipment, both of which just happen to be at Port Jervis. The first is the equipment which was in Passaic (the Passaic set), was encumbered by the IRS seizure, and for which title has been transferred to Operation Toy Train. The second is the equipment which was already at Port Jervis (the Port Jervis set) and for which Mr Wilson owes back storage fees. This was not included in the seizure and the city wants the non-payment resolved. While the Port Jervis set may well end up with Rudy and Carolyn, the city's action should have no impact on title to the pieces in the Passaic set.

Eric, would you care to elaborate?

_________________
Meghan

Subscribing to my grandfather's philosophy that no case is so weak or cause so harebrained that somebody cannot be found to handle it in exchange for a sufficient retainer up front.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Port Jervis Equipment Troubles
PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2021 10:56 am 

Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 10:08 am
Posts: 706
Overmod wrote:
Am I the only one who detects 'the other shoe dropping' on Eric Strohmeyer's cryptic post here a couple of weeks ago?

The previous thread you reference in which the aforementioned posts appeared included this:
rudystrains wrote:
Of note: the following comments relate solely to the former NYGL equipment that was located in Passaic, NJ, which Operation Toy Train took legal possession of on September 12, 2020. We have no involvement or legal interest in the NYGL equipment in Port Jervis, NY, other than the fact that we are still waiting for the NYGL to remove the equipment from the site so PJTM can begin museum construction.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Port Jervis Equipment Troubles
PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2021 11:01 am 

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 2:35 pm
Posts: 406
Location: NJ
Meghan,

Just a point of clarity. The Passaic equipment was moved to and is sitting in Lackawaxen, PA. The equipment in question in this thread is all in Port Jervis.

Chris

_________________
cv the civil E in NJ


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Port Jervis Equipment Troubles
PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:15 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 11:12 am
Posts: 569
Location: Somewhere off the coast of New England
cjvrr wrote:
Meghan,

Just a point of clarity. The Passaic equipment was moved to and is sitting in Lackawaxen, PA. The equipment in question in this thread is all in Port Jervis.

Chris
That brings us to a zero likelihood that the issues in Port Jervis will have an impact on the title to the Passaic set. If Brother Strohmeyer was referring to the pendency of the Port Jervis action in his remarks on the other thread then my granddaughter's belief that the shoe was not even on the same corpse is correct.

GME

_________________
No case so weak nor cause so harebrained that it cannot be handled for an adequate retainer up front.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Port Jervis Equipment Troubles
PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:05 pm 

Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 4:18 pm
Posts: 540
Location: Illinois
What shape is the Port Jervis equipment in? Has it been vandalized and ruined by the elements, such as the passenger equipment in Passaic was?

And who exactly is Jim Wilson? Is he from the Passaic area?

I have been involved in a few disputes such as this in the past, and they can be incredibly frustrating and unpleasant, with the deadlines and threats involved. Typically an owner that has grand plans, but then gets in way over his head financially, and runs out of options. And I have seen a few once-nice pieces of equipment get cut up after years of sitting outside with no maintenance. That NS coach was one rebuilt in 1994 - it would be very sad if that car was now stripped and vandalized after no maintenance for nearly 15 years.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Port Jervis Equipment Troubles
PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2021 7:07 pm 

Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 10:08 am
Posts: 706
Trainlawyer wrote:
If Brother Strohmeyer was referring to the pendency of the Port Jervis action in his remarks on the other thread then my granddaughter's belief that the shoe was not even on the same corpse is correct. GME

It appears to be not even the same cemetery.


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


 Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 72 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: