It is currently Thu Nov 23, 2017 4:33 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: PTC and Steam
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 8:13 pm 

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 11:14 pm
Posts: 55
The recent post about the 557 got me thinking, what exactly is going to happen to mainline steam when PTC comes around? In no way do I believe it will be the end, because UP just spent a bunch of money on 844, and are working on the 4014, but how exactly will those said locomotives operated in a PTC environment?

I can't really think of a way to install PTC on a steam locomotive, will the FRA issues waivers for operators? Or is this another one of those huge unknowns.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PTC and Steam
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 8:51 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 7:16 am
Posts: 1379
It is possible to install PTC on a steam locomotive, just requires cubic $$$$$ and some ingenuity.

PC

_________________
Advice from the multitude costs nothing and is often worth just that. (EMD-1945)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PTC and Steam
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 8:58 pm 

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 12:07 pm
Posts: 965
Location: Leicester, MA.
Tails brings up a good question... As I see it there's three questions to answer (and this forum might be a good place to solve some of those questions);
1) What equipment is necessary?
2) What is the power requirements for the equipment?
3) Where can the equipment be installed?

_________________
Dylan M. Lambert


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PTC and Steam
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 9:31 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 7:16 am
Posts: 1379
There are multiple suppliers of PTC equipment, and the form and design of the components varies from builder to builder. On most systems the main components are the processor unit, a power supply that may be separate or built-in, a memory module, and an operators interface. Additional hardware required includes a variety of sensors, magnet valves, speed pickups, and antennas, and the antenna mounting platform. For a steam locomotive, equipment for control of the throttle and/or power reverse is an additional factor.

The "form" of most of the modular components fits the microprocessor shelf in a modern diesel locomotive.

On a steam locomotive, available space and component placement are the challenge. The processor and memory need a protective enclosure, there has to be some space to mount the operator interface (probably above the engineer), and there needs to be a battery box (64v battery, 74v charging) and provision for charging the batteries. Another problem appearance-wise is the antenna array and its platform, it is obvious and ugly.

The description I provided is roughly based on the Wabtec system as applied to CSX SD40-3 locomotives. It does not apply to Northeast Corridor PTC/ACSES/ATC combined systems which require a great deal more space in the locomotive.

PC

_________________
Advice from the multitude costs nothing and is often worth just that. (EMD-1945)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PTC and Steam
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 11:05 am 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 794
Location: NJ
I know that 614, years ago, was equipped with cab signal to operate over NJ Transit's lines. With a diesel or electric, 'power knockdown' wouldn't be a problem, and air brakes are air brakes. I had often wondered, though, about closing the throttle on a steam locomotive with either cab signal or now PTC.

Would some sort of 'slip linkage' (for lack of a better term) with an air cylinder do the trick? With the air cylinder in one position, the throttle functions normally, the linkage is rigid; when told to close the throttle, the cylinder works through the slip linkage and shuts off steam. (Tough to describe, I know-)

DC power could come from an inverter off the 32V headlight generator, or another separate dedicated generator. On the Tornado, the Brits fitted an alternator to one of the tender axles, which charges batteries. LED headlights as well...

Could the antenna array be placed on top of the water space in the tender, with some sort of 'toolbox' built around it as camouflage?

Interesting thread, lots of challenges ahead, if steam is to operate on lines where PTC is required.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PTC and Steam
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 11:48 am 

Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 2:50 pm
Posts: 2094
Location: Northern Illinois
EDM wrote:

Could the antenna array be placed on top of the water space in the tender, with some sort of 'toolbox' built around it as camouflage?



I'd hide it UNDER the coal :-)

Seriously, many of the mainline locomotives operate with a canteen these days, and it seems to me that since the canteen has no "prototype", to borrow the modeler's term, all the housekeeping functions, antenna, batteries, charging generator can be banished to the canteen where they should not be objectionable. If that means the canteen needs to be permanently drawbarred to the tender to make it part of the "locomotive", so be it. The problem doesn't look insurmountable to me.

_________________
Dennis Storzek


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PTC and Steam
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 12:29 pm 

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 12:07 pm
Posts: 965
Location: Leicester, MA.
That throttle issue brings up an idea... Just thinking off the top of my head here, but if you have a throttle with a clutch or some sort of lock on it to prevent movement you need a mechanism that can both unlock the throttle and close it. I'd have to sketch it out, but couldn't an air or hydraulically driven piston be used to both unlock the thottle an close it in one motion?

_________________
Dylan M. Lambert


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PTC and Steam
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 2:00 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 794
Location: NJ
Dylan, that was exactly what I was suggesting.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PTC and Steam
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 3:10 pm 

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 3:30 pm
Posts: 142
Location: NH Shoreline
EDM wrote:
Could the antenna array be placed on top of the water space in the tender, with some sort of 'toolbox' built around it as camouflage?

While there is a radio antenna that is mounted on top for the purposes of receiving data (receiving temporary speed restrictions), the antenna that Mr. Cook is most likely referring to is the large ACSES receiver antenna that hangs underneath the vehicle. This antenna is used for reading the transponders which are permanently mounted in the gauge of the track, which provides data to the onboard equipment so that the system knows where the train is physically located on the railroad and at what speed limit that train should be operating.

In the picture below, you can see the cab signal track receiver coils which are directly behind the pilot plate. The large silver box hanging from the bracket is the ACSES antenna which reads the transponders. On this particular locomotive, the ACSES antenna is mounted under the F-end nose, however these antennas can be mounted almost anywhere on the underside of the equipment, they do not have to be on the leading end of the equipment in the same manner as the track receiver coils.


Attachments:
20160525.jpg
20160525.jpg [ 228.43 KiB | Viewed 1370 times ]
Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PTC and Steam
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 3:38 pm 

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 6:22 pm
Posts: 173
PTC requires a non-overrideable throttle shut-off and non-overrideable braking capability - not exactly possible with steam.
I'm really astonished that the PTC law - which was poorly written and rushed through - hasn't been repealed yet. Instituting a Canadian-style system would cost substantially less and give comparable levels of safety.

CD


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PTC and Steam
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 3:39 pm 

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 12:07 pm
Posts: 965
Location: Leicester, MA.
CREEPING DEATH wrote:
PTC requires a non-overrideable throttle shut-off and non-overrideable braking capability - not exactly possible with steam.
I'm really astonished that the PTC law - which was poorly written and rushed through - hasn't been repealed yet. Instituting a Canadian-style system would cost substantially less and give comparable levels of safety.

CD

So if that's the case, what happens when the law goes into full effect? No more mainline steam?

_________________
Dylan M. Lambert


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PTC and Steam
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 3:55 pm 

Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 57
Location: Pennsylvania
daylight4449 wrote:
CREEPING DEATH wrote:
PTC requires a non-overrideable throttle shut-off and non-overrideable braking capability - not exactly possible with steam.
I'm really astonished that the PTC law - which was poorly written and rushed through - hasn't been repealed yet. Instituting a Canadian-style system would cost substantially less and give comparable levels of safety.

CD

So if that's the case, what happens when the law goes into full effect? No more mainline steam?


26L and cab signals have been successfully adapted on many steam locomotives which shouldn't have too much issue complying with the braking requirements. A fancy mag valve could be adapted to control a steam shut off
on the dry pipe or delivery pipes. It takes some engineering but none of the above is impossible with a steam locomotive.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PTC and Steam
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 6:02 pm 

Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:43 am
Posts: 426
Location: Floyd, AR
What happens when you suddenly and involuntarily chop the throttle and loose the draft?
What happens when your now worried crew runs up to a hot fire and low water?
(Presuming that the cab crew is somehow incapacitated and that's why the PTC triggered)
Will the drivers lock up when the brakes get applied?
I suppose having the drivers flat or even have the boiler explode due to low water is 'better' then a wreck or derailment in a loaded passenger train. But still some things to consider.

_________________
Robert Longhofer,
Board Member, Cotton Belt Rail Historical Society, Arkansas Railroad Museum, steam engine SSW819.
Any information or opinions I express are my own, and are not the views of the CBRHS or anyone else, unless explicitly stated otherwise.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PTC and Steam
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 7:02 pm 

Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 57
Location: Pennsylvania
I would hope a sudden stop with the throttle closed wouldn't result in a boiler explosion. I expect a qualified fireman to be carrying water high enough that a quick stop wouldn't result in a low water situation that would jeopardize safety. As for the draft aspect I assume you hopefully have a functioning blower if you need it. I have been a part of at least one unexpected quick stop while firing a steamer and I simply made sure my injector was on and functioning properly. At no point did I feel like I needed to jump off and run for the hills. I can see possible flat spots if you can't bail or damage to cylinders due to lack of steam for lubrication and cushion. But PTC isn't meant to save equipment as much as human lives. Now keep in mind I don't nessicarily agree with the PTC mandate fully however I disagree that it cannot be adopted to steam locomotives.

Additionally what happens if all the crew members in the cab of s steamer become incapacitated now? Is PTC safer? Of course it depends on the situation but the safest train is usually the one that never moves and PTC should at the very worst keep the train static.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PTC and Steam
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 7:05 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 7:19 am
Posts: 5254
Location: southeastern USA
Low water is not a factor of not running, not since the crosshead pumps were replaced by injectors back in the 1870s. It's caused by faulty gauge glasses, bad firing or bad water and bad firing. Loss of draft simply makes the fire want to burn less. I've been firing when the air was pulled - it was slightly uncomfortable, but nothing likely to create a panic situation. I turned the gun on for cooling rather than water level to keep the pops from opening and creating another distraction noise to contend with. I also cracked the blower, not to make steam but to clear smoke and keep the fire alive.

_________________
"Techies never minded eating bits and jots of their work. They were grit and grease inside and out and could turn a pile of junk into a magical kingdom."

Andrea Hairston


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


 Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Brian Norden, Catalpa, David Notarius, Google [Bot], kevin kohls, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: