It is currently Tue May 20, 2025 11:25 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: A Comment about Ross
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2002 10:37 pm 

> I do know him; have known him for 20 years.
> Have had some peripheral involvment on
> various projects with him, attended meetings
> with him, etc.

> Undisputable truth: He has accomplished so
> many "impossible, never-happen"
> type things that it would take hours just to
> list them all. A master showman, master
> salesman and many other things in one,
> larger-than-life package.

> Undisputable truth #2: As noted, he pretty
> much introduced the concept of big steam to
> another generation. Who knows how many of
> today's preservationists and museum
> volunteers and even individual projects got
> their start from someone seeing one of
> Ross's engines performing?

> Undisputable truth #3: For all the good
> things, there have been some bad with
> lasting repercusions, and we have lost some
> things because of that. It's difficult to
> prove a negative, but some trips didn't
> happen because of Ross and some of his
> methods. Certain railroad officials, who
> were low-level peons back in the 1970's but
> today are CEO's and VPO's, having endured
> Ross events that went a little over the
> edge, swore they'd never allow steam.....ANY
> steam.....again if they were ever in a
> position to have say over it. And they have
> held to that vow, to our loss. There has
> been some negative fallout over the years
> that haunts us to this day in the form of
> railroads, large and small, with no-steam
> policies. Certainly Ross is not responsible
> for all of those, and I am not insinuating
> that he is. But he is primarily responsible
> for some, and it's important to keep the
> perspective in clear focus.

> Sometimes, you have to ask yourself: Which
> is more important? Doing an all-out,
> no-holds-barred trip that ties up the
> railroad, alienates and angers the officials
> of that railroad, produces spectacular
> photos and recordings and memories, but
> results in a 20-year no-steam policy? Or
> doing something perhaps a little less
> spectacular, less intrusive and less likely
> to tick off the host, thus building trust
> that opens the door (just a crack) to the
> possibility of future operations, maybe even
> culminating in a regular steam program on
> that road?

> So, in Ross, we have a great human being,
> warts and all, who has done great things,
> good and bad, and will probably do more
> great things.

> He's quite a guy.

Just my two cents-after reading about the discussion (good and bad) about Ross, I must agree that he is a remarkable guy. I'm 20 and couldn't imagine pulling-off what he did in his mid/late-20's and early-30's. Just some additional thoughts:
1) I remember in a thread here during the winter that D&H and Steamtown had a dispute that caused the 759, full of water, to be stored outside of a NY roundhouse during winter.
2) Is it common/correct practice to put a steam loco into winter/off-season storage full of fuel and water? Althought I remember a dispute with Steamtown caused them to pull it outside, and maybe the 2101 would've sufferred enough heat damage anyways to make its safe operation uncertain, it wouldn't seeem to be a good idea to me, even to just permit off-season inspection of the tender.
3) I remember reading an article about the NJT trips which during the first ever weekend of NJT trips (1997) I think the media attention it got was equal to $4 million of paid advertising (maybe the $4 million is high, but it was a sizeable sum of "free" advertising for NJT). Although running 8 or 10 trips a year might be lead to exhausting interest in the Hoboken-Port Jervis trips. Who knows though, once they restore the Lackawanna Cutoff, steam might again be departing Hoboken for a trip east on NJT rails (to Scranton, Phillipsburg)
4) To sum it up, I believe the net result of Ross' contributions to the steam movement, based on my recently gained knowledge about him here (and the tidbits I knew about him from the past), would be somewhere on the positive side.
5) I believe the 759's first fantrip following its three month restoration (I believe) in Conneaut was Conneaut to Buffalo (not North East). Living in the Buffalo area, I remember seeing this info somewhere (in a book, photo caption), unless my memory is fuzzy about this.

JBeutel611@aol.com


  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


 Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 219 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: