It is currently Thu Jul 30, 2026 3:50 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: 2-10-2's were Santa Fe types; 2-10-0's were Decapods
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:27 am 

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:25 pm
Posts: 6482
A couple of recent threads referred to 2-10-2 locomotives as Decapods, which is incorrect. The 2-10-2 was the Santa Fe type whereas Decapods were actually 2-10-0's. I understand that some railroads used different names for their engines. This might be especially true of the 2-10-2 as the Santa Fe was actually a competitor during the steam era. For instance, on the Illinois Central, the 2-10-2 was known as the "Central" type. As we move further and further away from the steam era and knowledge of steam locomotive nomenclature slowly fades away, we should at least call a spade a spade, unless we know for sure that a particular railroad officially used a different name.

My soap box rant for the day.

Les


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2-10-2's were Santa Fe types; 2-10-0's were Decapods
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:52 am 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 7:58 am
Posts: 728
Not a rant at all, Les, just a correction. I meant to mention it in the affected threads, but was too busy to post at the time.

It's good to take care of it, before confusion spreads. With ten-coupled power being somewhat rare, and regular service steam receding deeper into the past, it's not surprising that people might get it wrong.

Steve Hunter


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2-10-2's were Santa Fe types; 2-10-0's were Decapods
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 11:27 am 

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 9:37 pm
Posts: 327
Location: Niles Canyon Railway, near Sunol, CA
On the Southern Pacific, a 2-10-2 was called a "Deck" (short for decapod) or "36-hundred" or "37-hundred". No S.P. employee would ever describe one of their locomotives using the name of their arch-rival, that other western railroad.

- Doug Debs


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2-10-2's were Santa Fe types; 2-10-0's were Decapods
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 11:38 am 

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 3:07 pm
Posts: 705
Out of curiosity, what did the Central of Georgia call their 4-8-4s?

Certainly not "Northerns!"


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2-10-2's were Santa Fe types; 2-10-0's were Decapods
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:13 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 8:28 am
Posts: 2732
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
David H. Hamley wrote:
Out of curiosity, what did the Central of Georgia call their 4-8-4s?

Certainly not "Northerns!"


I want to say "Big Apples" as it comes to mind, which is also somewhat ironic, if you think about it.

In a similar vein, C&O crews reportedly called the 2-8-4s "Big Mikes" as in big mikados. The C&O classified them as K-4 class, in the same letter designation as the road's 2-8-2s, of which the K-3s were the largest.

Like the SP 2-10-2 example above, the names often given by the enthusiast community do not carry over to the actual, working railroaders.

_________________
David M. Wilkins

"They love him, gentlemen, and they respect him, not only for himself, for his character, for his integrity and judgment and iron will, but they love him most of all for the enemies he has made."


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2-10-2's were Santa Fe types; 2-10-0's were Decapods
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:06 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 7:19 am
Posts: 6464
Location: southeastern USA
Big Apple is what they were called generally; Big Peach would be more regionally accurate. None survived.

dave

_________________
“God, the beautiful racket of it all: the sighing and hissing, the rattle and clack of the cars over the rails. These were the sounds that made America the greatest country on earth." Jonathan Evison


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2-10-2's were Santa Fe types; 2-10-0's were Decapods
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:18 pm 

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:25 pm
Posts: 6482
Dave wrote:
Big Apple is what they were called generally; Big Peach would be more regionally accurate. None survived.

dave


Dave -

As I recall, one of the "Big Apple" 4-8-4's was set aside for preservation, but a new President of the CofG nixed the deal, and sent the engine to the scrapper instead. Too bad. BTW, a number of the southern railroads called their 4-8-4's "Dixie's" I believe, including the NC&StL. I am not sure what the CofG officially called their 4-8-4's but I think "Big Apple" was a nickname used by engine crews.

Les


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2-10-2's were Santa Fe types; 2-10-0's were Decapods
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:21 pm 

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:25 pm
Posts: 6482
wilkinsd wrote:

In a similar vein, C&O crews reportedly called the 2-8-4s "Big Mikes" as in big mikados. The C&O classified them as K-4 class, in the same letter designation as the road's 2-8-2s, of which the K-3s were the largest.



David -

The Chesapeake & Ohio officially called their 2-8-4's "Kanawha's", rather than Berkshires. And yes, the nickname the crews used was "Big Mikes".

Les


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2-10-2's were Decks on the Southern Pacific
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:57 pm 

Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:23 am
Posts: 462
Location: Sheboygan County, Wisconsin
Doug Debs 2472 wrote:
On the Southern Pacific, a 2-10-2 was called a "Deck" (short for decapod) or "36-hundred" or "37-hundred". No S.P. employee would ever describe one of their locomotives using the name of their arch-rival, that other western railroad.

- Doug Debs



Thanks for taking care of that Doug. Careful reading will note that I referred to
them as Decks and not Decapods.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2-10-2's were Santa Fe types; 2-10-0's were Decapods
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:59 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 8:31 am
Posts: 1340
Location: South Carolina
My impression is that these names for engine types must have been pretty much used by railroad management and railfans. I never heard anyone with "authentic" steam knowledge/experience refer to any engine class other than by the series numbers. My Dad always talked about the "1800's" on the Atlantic Coast Line (not "R-1's") and the N&W guys I worked with never referred to one of their 2-6-6-4's as an "A", they called it a "1200".

For example, an actual quote I heard regarding an older N&W foreman getting excited about something: "He was pantin' like a 1200!".

_________________
Hugh Odom
The Ultimate Steam Page
http://www.trainweb.org/tusp


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2-10-2's were Santa Fe types; 2-10-0's were Decapods
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 2:06 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 8:28 am
Posts: 2732
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Les Beckman wrote:
wilkinsd wrote:

In a similar vein, C&O crews reportedly called the 2-8-4s "Big Mikes" as in big mikados. The C&O classified them as K-4 class, in the same letter designation as the road's 2-8-2s, of which the K-3s were the largest.



David -

The Chesapeake & Ohio officially called their 2-8-4's "Kanawha's", rather than Berkshires. And yes, the nickname the crews used was "Big Mikes".

Les


Les,

Yes, I know this, but if you read my post, I saw "crews." The point is that the names we use and the names they actually used can sometimes be quite different.

_________________
David M. Wilkins

"They love him, gentlemen, and they respect him, not only for himself, for his character, for his integrity and judgment and iron will, but they love him most of all for the enemies he has made."


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2-10-2's were Santa Fe types; 2-10-0's were Decapods
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 2:18 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 2:46 pm
Posts: 2693
Location: Pac NW, via North Florida
How about 2-8-2s became "MacArthurs" on many roads during WW2 because nobody wanted to use that Japanese name?

_________________
Lee Bishop


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2-10-2's were Santa Fe types; 2-10-0's were Decapods
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:19 pm 

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 9:34 pm
Posts: 2836
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
OK I am sorry already. I was tired when I wrote it.

_________________
Steven Harrod
Lektor
Danmarks Tekniske Universitet


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2-10-2's were Santa Fe types; 2-10-0's were Decapods
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:51 am 

Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 1899
Location: Youngstown, OH
0-10-2s are the Union type after their only purchaser.

_________________
From the desk of Rick Rowlands
inside Conrail caboose 21747


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2-10-2's were Santa Fe types; 2-10-0's were Decapods
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 1:18 am 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 8:51 pm
Posts: 2055
Location: Southern California
whodom wrote:
My impression is that these names for engine types must have been pretty much used by railroad management and railfans.
And the management was often partial to its own view of its railroad and the region.

The New York Central and its "Water Level Route" never called a 4-8-2 a "Mountain" but instead chose to call them "Mohawk" after the river. Similarly it liked the name "Niagara" for 4-8-4s.

South of the Mason-Dickson Line 4-8-4s were called such names as Dixie or Confederation and not the horrid name "Northern."

The UP called 2-8-2s "Mikado" until it became politically inappropriate after Pearl Harbor; then it chose "MacArthur." The class initials reflected this change. The class of the 844 is FEF for four-eight-four.

When 4-8-4s showed up on the Santa Fe they were referred to as "improved Mountains" and not as "Northerns."

_________________
Brian Norden


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: