It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 8:09 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 131 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 734 news, not so good
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 5:35 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 7:58 pm
Posts: 111
Location: Hershey, PA
Howard P. wrote:
Guys, give it a rest for now. I'd bet there are plenty of things going on behind the curtain, so to speak. 734 could roll in at the last moment.

That would be awesome, considering there is no legit reason why CSX backed out right now.

_________________
-MCH
Visit the NKP 765's website: http://www.fortwaynerailroad.org


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 734 news, not so good
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 5:54 pm 

Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 4:02 pm
Posts: 1839
Location: Back in NE Ohio
Alan Maples wrote:
I have no special knowledge of the circumstances here, but suspect when the dust settles this is more likely a solid bearing issue and not a steam locomotive issue per se. CSX has been adamant about not moving equipment with solid bearings and making an exception now exposes the railroad to future demands for more exceptions.

Alan Maples


Alan;

They knew it had solid bearings from the beginning, right? Why wait until the week before the event to pull the plug, why not just deny the move up front, before a lot of people committed a lot of time and money to this?


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 734 news, not so good
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 6:28 pm 

Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 9:42 pm
Posts: 2950
Quote:
They knew it had solid bearings from the beginning, right? Why wait until the week before the event to pull the plug, why not just deny the move up front, before a lot of people committed a lot of time and money to this?


I don't know any details or specifics, so just a general comment. Don't presume that they did (or didn't) know it had solid bearings or anything else that influenced the move. Maybe they thought it had roller bearings, or didn't even know enough to ask the question.

I would be interested in knowing what ruined the deal, especially for such a short distance with an engine that has a proven track record. Run her at 10 mph if you must, heck even go 5 mph, and do it at 3 AM on Sunday when nothing else is running if need be... I think this move could have been done with a reasonable expectation of success.

But they obviously had some reason, be it related to the engines or to the corporate finances, legal department and whatever. It's just too bad it wasn't decided until the last minute.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 734 news, not so good
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 7:12 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 7:19 am
Posts: 6464
Location: southeastern USA
It's the railroad guys - Sh*t happens........combined with the entertainment industry, which operates on ignoring the Law of Unforseeable Consequences and hoping Murphy is dozing.

Will: we can add NHVRR to the list on the other thread of railroads having 2 disconnected sections - in NHVRRs case, those sections are seperated by CSX mainline where a diamond used to be, but isn't any more. We might want to get over there some day. As a member of NHVRR, I do wish you would tone down the rhetoric for long term strategic reasons if nothing else, since NHVRR is prominent in your signature. Just a friendly request.

I'd suggest the majority of people at the retail decision making level in Ops these days lack the depth of practical railroading experience that would have been common as ballast in the old days, especially practices that have become obsolete such as plain bearings, 6ET brakes, AAR control stands, stemwinders - whatever. They do a fine job of getting modern stuff over the road and do it in an atmosphere which rewards saying NO to unusual requests rather than taking chances on unfamiliar and unusual less revenue creating activities requiring more babysitting if not actual work. Very few boomers circulate any more, removing one sort of circuit-college of broad experience to be shared. Vision narrows.

We either cultivate higher-ups with vision who will exert their influence, or figure out how to make our obsolete stuff familiar to the functionaries. Thanks to the UP guys and 261, etc for showing it is possible, our best hope for more in the future. Hope you make this one work, Jason.

dave

_________________
“God, the beautiful racket of it all: the sighing and hissing, the rattle and clack of the cars over the rails. These were the sounds that made America the greatest country on earth." Jonathan Evison


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 734 news, not so good
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 7:55 pm 

Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 8:41 pm
Posts: 88
Location: NC
Dave wrote:
Will: I do wish you would tone down the rhetoric for long term strategic reasons if nothing
dave


Are you serious??

This is almost laughable. C'mon Dave, for two guys that have worked along side of each other, I would have thought a PM would have been a little more appropriate from you.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 734 news, not so good
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 8:38 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:36 pm
Posts: 103
Location: East Ely, Nevada
Hmmm, they will move a diesel and not a steamer. I think they just don't like steamers

I think this may be the only way to put this.....if anything just for a good laugh
http://csx-sucks.com/

Anthony

_________________
Nevada Northern Railway Museum
A National Historic Landmark, East Ely Nevada
Click Here For More Info On Our Programs


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 734 news, not so good
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 8:56 pm 

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 12:37 pm
Posts: 450
Location: Missoula MT
Dave wrote:
We either cultivate higher-ups with vision who will exert their influence, or figure out how to make our obsolete stuff familiar to the functionaries. Thanks to the UP guys and 261, etc for showing it is possible, our best hope for more in the future. Hope you make this one work, Jason.

dave


For those people with steam engines, or an interest in steam engines, or a strategic partnership with somebody with a steam engine: Why not offer free admission, special access or whatever to your local roadmasters, trainmasters and mid-level Class One folks who can make or break any future plans of running steam engines? Granted, some/most of those railroaders might scoff, and they (esp management) have an annoying tendency to get relocated, but keeping an open invitation to our class one partners might be the mechanism to demonstrate our professionalism and make handling our product more palatable to those who might otherwise say "NO".

So far as the current debacle, all I see here is a failure to communicate. Hopefully somebody will be willing to find out the root cause and work around that rather than frump and whine--which does none of us any good.

Michael Seitz
Missoula MT


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 734 news, not so good
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 9:48 pm 

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 11:46 am
Posts: 203
Location: here, there, wherever
Miketherailfan wrote:
Howard P. wrote:
Guys, give it a rest for now. I'd bet there are plenty of things going on behind the curtain, so to speak. 734 could roll in at the last moment.

That would be awesome, considering there is no legit reason why CSX backed out right now.


Do we know they didn't have a legit reason? I've seen plenty of equipment that could not be moved for one reason or another. In the end, it is their sandbox, and their rules.

I do see the endless CSX bashing has started in force. I'd expect that from the more foamerish forums, but not here.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 734 news, not so good
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:13 pm 

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 8:10 am
Posts: 2499
Good call Zug. I would hope for professional curiosity here and foaming on TO or railroad.net

Rob

_________________
Rob


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 734 news, not so good
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:23 pm 

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 8:29 pm
Posts: 397
CSX has been impossible to deal with recently. I have heard a number of stories about equipment that will apparently NEVER turn a wheel on CSX tracks. No idea what caused this turn of events but they are sticking fast to their decision to restrict all but normal freight operations.

T7


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 734 news, not so good
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:28 pm 

Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 2:01 pm
Posts: 124
Location: Chattanooga
Please add me to the list of CSX bashers who think it most pathetic that a Class 1 has decided not run a steam loco Dead In Tow for 10 miles behind a diesel. Of course we're fans on this site but fans must be allowed to vent when something this silly happens.

I would think that Jason and friends got this approved well in advance of announcing it. For that approval now to be pulled by CSX is most sad and unnecessary.

For those of you who justify CSX's bad behavior, I just don't understand you.

There! I fell somewhat better.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 734 news, not so good
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:37 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 11:54 pm
Posts: 2527
Sorry, I hate to sound like the infamous Superheater, but I'm really not interested if there's no big steam and would like to save my money for an occasion that will include some.

I'm something of a believer in you can call me anything you like, just don't call me late for dinner, however: have no fear-in your rush to flatter yourself-you aren't attributing me properly.

I have implicitly expressed a disdain for megaferroequinophilia as that genre is generally uneconomical. See my thoughts on 2926. I wish them well, but wonder how they could find a place to run and turn enough of a buck to have a sinking fund for the 1472, given the difficulties in getting a host road and insurance. Yes, 261 has done it, but the issues with "big steam" have been well covered re: 819, 1522, 2100, 2102, etc.

I'm planning on backing up that sentiment by plunking down a few sheckles this Sunday to do my part so Flagg 75 finds their stay in Scranton profitable; and having been a little late on tix for the diesel powered Sunbury trip, I'm chasing it.

I like big steam, but I'm a realist. I wouldn't skip out on an event because the biggest steam engine scheduled is unable to make it. Who doesn't put the "right to substitute motive power" disclaimer on their tickets. Zugman's right: ITS THEIR SANDBOX, they have a responsibility to the safe and efficient operation of the RR; not to the FRN "community". A tentative agreement is a first date; not a trip to the altar.


Last edited by superheater on Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 734 news, not so good
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:39 pm 

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 11:46 am
Posts: 203
Location: here, there, wherever
DavidKaplan wrote:
Please add me to the list of CSX bashers who think it most pathetic that a Class 1 has decided not run a steam loco Dead In Tow for 10 miles behind a diesel. Of course we're fans on this site but fans must be allowed to vent when something this silly happens.

I would think that Jason and friends got this approved well in advance of announcing it. For that approval now to be pulled by CSX is most sad and unnecessary.

For those of you who justify CSX's bad behavior, I just don't understand you.

There! I fell somewhat better.


Justify? Nah, but a coin has two sides. I've seen plenty of groups/companies that have thought their equipment was super great, but to a class-1, it's just another piece of equipment (and maybe more of a hassle than it is worth).

Some of us are a little more involved with class-1 operations than others on here. Just because you have the blessing of a local trianmaster/roadmaster/roadforeman, does not mean you have the approval of the RR. To move something like the 734, you need someone high up the corporate ladder pulling for you. Most local types are NOT going to stick their necks for a special move like that. Because if something would happen, they will be at the division HQ doing the carpet dance in front of the superintendent. And if the screw up is bad enough, they will end up working 3rd trick trainmaster in some hellhole in the armpit of the system.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 734 news, not so good
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:48 pm 

Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 4:02 pm
Posts: 1839
Location: Back in NE Ohio
superheater wrote:
Sorry, I hate to sound like the infamous Superheater, but I'm really not interested if there's no big steam and would like to save my money for an occasion that will include some.

I'm something of a believer in you can call me anything you like, just don't call me late for dinner, however: have no fear-in your rush to flatter yourself-you aren't attributing me properly.

I have implicitly expressed a disdain for megaferroequinophilia as that genre is generally uneconomical. See my thoughts on 2926. I wish them well, but wonder how they could find a place to run and turn enough of a buck to have a sinking fund for the 1472, given the difficulties in getting a host road and insurance. Yes, 261 has done it, but the issues with "big steam" have been well covered re: 819, 1522, 2100, 2102, etc.


Trust me, you're probably not the Superheater (D. L.) I was referring to, since you can communicate in more than two syllable words. Older heads in the East know of whom I speak.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 734 news, not so good
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:55 pm 

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:06 pm
Posts: 2563
Location: Thomaston & White Plains
"Trust me, you're probably not the Superheater (D. L.) I was referring to, since you can communicate in more than two syllable words. Older heads in the East know of whom I speak."

Oh, we sure do!! Somewhere, I still have a couple of those infamous single-spaced, right-out-to-the-margins, semi-coherent letters D.L. used to send out. They were saved because future generations would not believe D. L. existed without that evidence. I suspect Ross was the recipient of dozens of them....

No, "our" superheater is on a much higher plane, and there was never any confusion, just a chuckle on seeing your handle for the first time....it did give pause for 30-40 seconds.

Howard P.

_________________
"I'm a railroad man, not a prophet."


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 131 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


 Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 67 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: