It is currently Fri May 23, 2025 10:16 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 130 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Chicago Northwestern #1385 to Receive a New Boiler
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 11:07 am 

Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 8:03 pm
Posts: 1094
Location: Warszawa, Polska
If replacing a riveted boiler with a welded boiler can create problems concerning the overall dimensions of the welded boiler (for example the problem created by replacing a 3-course, telescopic riveted shell, with a cylindrical or conical shaped shell), and weight issues, among others, how come replacing a riveted boiler with a riveted boiler is off the table?

_________________
CNR 6167 in Guelph, ON or "How NOT To Restore A Steam Locomotive"


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chicago Northwestern #1385 to Receive a New Boiler
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 12:04 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 7:19 am
Posts: 6464
Location: southeastern USA
Few code boiler shops rivet any longer.

dave

_________________
“God, the beautiful racket of it all: the sighing and hissing, the rattle and clack of the cars over the rails. These were the sounds that made America the greatest country on earth." Jonathan Evison


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chicago Northwestern #1385 to Receive a New Boiler
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 12:59 pm 

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:40 pm
Posts: 841
The "conflict" between FRA rules, ASME code, and individual railroad practices is a long one, and goes back to well before there was an FRA. Back when it was the ICC.

ASME is working on a fully revised and updated code of original construction for new locomotive boilers. Maybe it will be issued soon. ('Soon' meaning in a couple of years). Someone please correct me, but I think the last time this code was issued or revised was in the late 1940s or early 1950s.


Hopefully, that will make ASME shops aware of the differences required for locomotive boilers, such as the closer staybolt spacing. It will definitely make them accountable to adhere to the code.

It will still require customers to stay on top of what they are buying to insure the shop is using the correct code sections in the design and construction of a new boiler so that tehy don't end up with a large, expensive, conversation piece sitting in their parking lot.

Caveat emptor.


Last edited by Lincoln Penn on Tue Mar 10, 2015 1:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chicago Northwestern #1385 to Receive a New Boiler
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 1:02 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 8:28 am
Posts: 2727
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Does anyone have photos, drawings or other information detailing the location of the arch tubes in 1385's boiler?

I'm curious as to why you couldn't relocate them to come into contact at the throat sheet, or lower in the throat sheet, in order to change the ach of the firebrick and keep the "blanked" area open for tubes, but above the arch brick?

Also, has anyone looked at the boiler on the other two R1s still around? Do they have the same arrangement?

Also, what solution did Mr. Austin propose back in 2001 that has apparently been forgotten?

_________________
David M. Wilkins

"They love him, gentlemen, and they respect him, not only for himself, for his character, for his integrity and judgment and iron will, but they love him most of all for the enemies he has made."


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chicago Northwestern #1385 to Receive a New Boiler
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 3:46 pm 

Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 1:05 am
Posts: 481
wilkinsd wrote:
Also, what solution did Mr. Austin propose back in 2001 that has apparently been forgotten?
M Austin wrote:

The Solution: What Dave said.... (minus those thermic syphon doohickeys)

Dave wrote:
This could be an opportunity to use modern cast arch material to eliminate a lot of the bulk, and relocate the arch tubes to further down so you can get all the tubes in you can fit and avoid those damn braces. Perhaps more smaller arch tubes as well? Thermic syphons instead? Lots of room in a new build to gain efficiency and reduce headaches.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chicago Northwestern #1385 to Receive a New Boiler
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 5:16 pm 

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:40 pm
Posts: 841
Dave:

From experience, thermic syphons do NOT reduce headaches. They increase them.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chicago Northwestern #1385 to Receive a New Boiler
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 9:39 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 7:19 am
Posts: 6464
Location: southeastern USA
Chattahoochee Valley 21 - installed home made thermic syphons, and the firemen couldn't keep her from [popping off, while the boilermakers couldn't keep her from leaking. I was simply floating an idea that wasn't arch tubes in an intrusive location. Circulators may have been a better choice.......

What's your syphon story, Linc? I never had any hands-on with one.

dave

_________________
“God, the beautiful racket of it all: the sighing and hissing, the rattle and clack of the cars over the rails. These were the sounds that made America the greatest country on earth." Jonathan Evison


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chicago Northwestern #1385 to Receive a New Boiler
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 10:28 pm 

Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 2:06 am
Posts: 381
JJG Koopmans wrote:
Does anyone know the length and the diameter of the tubes? Plugging can also be caused
by a too small diameter for its length. L/D=100 appears to be optimal, but whether that was known at the time?...


Kind regards
Jos Koopmans


They are 2" diameter X 196" long sheet to sheet. Very close to your stated optimal ratio.

mld


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chicago Northwestern #1385 to Receive a New Boiler
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 12:15 am 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 7:19 am
Posts: 6464
Location: southeastern USA
Probably a combination of design of the firebox hardware and front end appliances together would solve the problem of clogging tubes. The Master Mechanic's front end supposedly could be adjusted for shifting the draft across the tube bundle, but perhaps it lost some ability to be adjusted when it had to share the front end with the superheater hardware.

dave

_________________
“God, the beautiful racket of it all: the sighing and hissing, the rattle and clack of the cars over the rails. These were the sounds that made America the greatest country on earth." Jonathan Evison


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chicago Northwestern #1385 to Receive a New Boiler
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 11:02 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 9:34 am
Posts: 382
If the arch came down to the base of the arch tubes, then the addition of some heel bricks could solve the tube plugging issues.

I think we all prefer low tech solutions.

_________________
G. Mark Ray - TVRM
www.tvrail.com


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chicago Northwestern #1385 to Receive a New Boiler
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2015 7:41 pm 

Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 2:06 am
Posts: 381
wilkinsd wrote:
Only two rows of superheaters?...


Attachment:
R-1 Old Firebox small.jpg
R-1 Old Firebox small.jpg [ 297.75 KiB | Viewed 8736 times ]


A somewhat better picture shows all 3 rows. The arch tube holes also show well in the throat sheet. Conjecture on my part: If you drop them much more then the bottom of the brick may be getting close enough to the grates to make it difficult to fire without bouncing coal off the brick. mld

Thanks to Brian Allen for sharing the photograph.


Last edited by mldeets on Wed Mar 18, 2015 8:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chicago Northwestern #1385 to Receive a New Boiler
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2015 7:58 pm 

Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:41 pm
Posts: 540
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Attachment:
R-1 Old Firebox small.jpg


This is a really typical early application of superheat to a saturated loco. At the Minnesota Transportation Museum we have a pair of NP Class Q3 Pacifics that were built as saturated and later had superheaters installed. They also have only three rows of superheaters.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chicago Northwestern #1385 to Receive a New Boiler
PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2015 9:56 am 

Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:45 am
Posts: 366
Location: Skagway, Alaska
Kelly mentioned the K-28 and bottom flues in relation to the arch brick. I looked around and couldn't find a good one of the 28's, but you can see them on a K-36 which are pretty similar. When the K-28's are working hard, you have to fire them with a massive heel to force the area under the brick to draft continuously, otherwise the front foot or so "goes out" or takes an incredibly long time to clean itself of ash. Frustrating when you're training new fireman and the engine has to be fired right on the edge or you'll have to stop.


Attachments:
DSCF1831s.JPG
DSCF1831s.JPG [ 34.13 KiB | Viewed 8557 times ]

_________________
This is the end of my post.
Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chicago Northwestern #1385 to Receive a New Boiler
PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2015 2:17 pm 

Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 1:05 am
Posts: 481
Let's see... Challenging for the fireman to put a scoop of coal in the right spot or challenging for the boilermaker to fix all the cracks. My thought process tends to lean in favor of making life easier for the boilermaker.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chicago Northwestern #1385 to Receive a New Boiler
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 11:34 am 

Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:45 am
Posts: 366
Location: Skagway, Alaska
Well, both. Keeping the engine hot and failures to do so can go both ways on blame.

_________________
This is the end of my post.


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 130 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


 Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 137 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: