| Railway Preservation News https://www.rypn.org/forums/ |
|
| NdeM 3028 photos https://www.rypn.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=11478 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | bobyar2001 [ Tue Nov 23, 2004 9:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | NdeM 3028 photos |
A few more photos of ongoing work on this 4-8-4, being worked on by volunteers at the New Hope & Ivyland RR in Pennsylvania. Taken this month. http://www.nhrrvolunteers.org/My_Homepa ... Page9.html |
|
| Author: | Finderskeepers [ Wed Nov 24, 2004 9:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NdeM 3028 photos |
I've never seen published stats for this engine, how does it compare with Ohio Central's 6325? I would imaging they are similar. Here are some numbers on the Ohio engine, so you don't have to look that half of it up. http://www.sbrhs.org/484com.html |
|
| Author: | tomgears [ Wed Nov 24, 2004 9:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NdeM 3028 photos |
I am all for another locomotive in steam but isn't this locomotive about 8 sizes too big for what they are doing? Tom |
|
| Author: | Finderskeepers [ Wed Nov 24, 2004 9:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NdeM 3028 photos |
Sometimes with a little more digging, one can find the answers! GTW N De M 73 70 Driver Dia 245,000 241,000 Weight on Drivers 403,000 387,000 Engine Weight 673,000 632,000 Engine and Tender 84.3 77.3 Grate Area 26X30 25X30 Cylinder Size 250 250 Boiler PSI 59,000 57,000 Tractive Effort 1942 1946 Built |
|
| Author: | Wooly [ Thu Nov 25, 2004 2:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NdeM 3028 photos |
Well I would certainly argue the fact that Jensen refused to move 5632 & I think others would too...............................................................Wooly |
|
| Author: | Finderskeepers [ Fri Nov 26, 2004 12:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NdeM 3028 photos |
Wooly wrote: Well I would certainly argue the fact that Jensen refused to move 5632 & I think others would too...............................................................Wooly
Nope, wrong engine, I was comparing the Ohio Central 6325 (ex GTW 6325) to NdeM 3028. Jensen's 4-8-4 that was scrapped was Burlington (CB&Q) 4-8-4 5632. The 5632 was at least 70,000 lbs heavier than the 6325! |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|