Railway Preservation News
https://www.rypn.org/forums/

St. Paul Bridge Demolition
https://www.rypn.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=20764
Page 1 of 1

Author:  bobyar2001 [ Thu Jun 08, 2006 4:37 pm ]
Post subject:  St. Paul Bridge Demolition

Former Rock Island:

http://www.startribune.com/462/story/477491.html

Author:  ebtrr [ Thu Jun 08, 2006 4:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: St. Paul Bridge Demolition

"Repairs would cost more than $1 million"

I bet they won't get a replacement for that much.

Author:  bobyar2001 [ Thu Jun 08, 2006 6:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: St. Paul Bridge Demolition

Yes, a million today is not much. My guess is that the person that said that probably did not have a real idea what it might cost and grabbed the figure out of the air. Because of river traffic, it could not be just welded in place for a bike path, etc., and would have to remain moveable, which would probably be pretty expensive to repair. It would be interesting to know the pricetag on what similar swing bridge repairs cost.

Author:  Ron Travis [ Thu Jun 08, 2006 6:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: St. Paul Bridge Demolition

Yes in progressive Minnesota, these old artifacts left over from the industrial revolution are seen as blemishes.

Author:  Paul D [ Sat Jun 10, 2006 9:07 am ]
Post subject:  Re: St. Paul Bridge Demolition

While I regret to see the bridge die. I did drive over it once in the mid 90's and found it rather harrowing and drove it only once. It was on par with the old Lake Street bridge that was replaced in about 1990.

I doubt that 1 millon would cover the engineering to scope the repairs.

On a similar note is the old CGW lift span in downtown St. Paul still in service?

Paul

Author:  Andy Inserra [ Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:37 am ]
Post subject:  Re: St. Paul Bridge Demolition

The lift bridge is in service in downtown, I work near it and regularly see UP and CP trains use the span over the lunch hour...

Author:  softwerkslex [ Mon Jun 12, 2006 8:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: St. Paul Bridge Demolition

I think the repair cost is just a polite excuse. Note the bridge is privately owned. It is likely issues such as liability, insurance, and the human cost of collecting the toll made the venture unprofitable as costs rose.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/