| Railway Preservation News https://www.rypn.org/forums/ |
|
| Wannamaker, Kempton & Southern https://www.rypn.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=20947 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Kevin Gillespie [ Sun Jul 09, 2006 2:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Wannamaker, Kempton & Southern |
Does anyone remember why the WK&S sold their 2-6-2 ex-BH&S #250? I rode behind her in the late 60's on the WK&S, and much prefer tender locomotives to tank engines. A tank engine does not look right as a road engine on the head of a passenger train. |
|
| Author: | Christian S. [ Sun Jul 09, 2006 2:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wannamaker, Kempton & Southern |
[redacted] |
|
| Author: | G. W. Laepple [ Sun Jul 09, 2006 6:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wannamaker, Kempton & Southern |
I believe the WK&S sold no. 250 to raise the cash necessary to continue operating in the late 1960's when the "first generation" of volunteers aged out or lost interest. It was strictly a practical decision, as the expense of operating no. 250 as compared to the saddle-tankers was excessive. Had that difficult decision not been made, it's questionable whether the WK&S would even exist today. |
|
| Author: | Kevin Gillespie [ Sun Jul 09, 2006 7:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wannamaker, Kempton & Southern |
Thank you gentlemen. You have answered my question. That's the beauty of this forum. You get knowledgeable answers in very short order. |
|
| Author: | Alan Maples [ Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wannamaker, Kempton & Southern |
Kevin, I highly recommend picking up a copy of Wally Ely's "Does This Train Go Up Hawk Mountain?", a delightful book that gives a complete history of the WK&S, including events leading up to the sale of the 2-6-2. As for the tank engine, while it may lack a bit aesthetically, it puts on a good show and has a certain charm that fits nicely with the WK&S's country short line feel. Alan Maples |
|
| Author: | Alan S. Levy [ Mon Jul 10, 2006 12:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wannamaker, Kempton & Southern |
Did those folks ever get tracks laid into their enginehouse? Last I was there the building was up, but there were no tracks or switches put it. |
|
| Author: | Dave [ Mon Jul 10, 2006 1:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wannamaker, Kempton & Southern |
Historically, side tank engines were not uncommon on commuter trains towards the end of the 19th - early 20th centuries. I don't know if saddle tank engines were as commonly used for that purpose. I think a Western example remains at Niles Canyon if I am not mistaken - it has been many years since I was there. I seem to recall one at Steamtown too. Glovers built a 2-6-2 tank engine for passenger service on the Cliffside. Much more common in the UK. dave |
|
| Author: | Alan Maples [ Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wannamaker, Kempton & Southern |
Quote: Did those folks ever get tracks laid into their enginehouse?
A friend forwarded an email just this morning indicating that one track is now installed in the enginehouse. A one ton jib crane has just been placed in the shop; construction of the second track was held off so the crane footer could be poured. Alan Maples |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|