It is currently Wed Aug 19, 2026 10:18 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Lake Street Elevated 10
PostPosted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 1:38 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 9:35 am
Posts: 8139
Location: Wilton, NY
Builder's photo:

http://abpr.railfan.net/abprphoto.cgi?o ... anColl.jpg

Interesting period shot with the 17:

http://abpr.railfan.net/abprphoto.cgi?o ... anColl.jpg


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lake Street Elevated 10
PostPosted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 1:35 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 2:46 pm
Posts: 658
Location: St. Louis, MO
This loco is the sister of Lake Street Elevated #9 which is at the Museum of Transportation in St. Louis. Of the 400 or so Forney type locos used on elevated lines in New York, Brooklyn (independent until about 1899) and Chicago it is the only one preserved in a museum. It was taken back to Chicago for the centennial of the Loop Elevated in 1997 after a cosmetic restoration a few years earlier. Only five other former elevated Forneys survive, three derilicts in Alaska, one derelict in a Louisiana swamp, all from New York, and one from the South Side Elevated in Chicago stuffed and mounted in Cuba near a sugar mill.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Wrong number
PostPosted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 5:01 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 9:35 am
Posts: 8139
Location: Wilton, NY
Sorry, I thought the surviving one was the 10. Apparently not.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wrong number
PostPosted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 10:33 am 

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 2:14 pm
Posts: 618
Location: Essex, Connecticut, USA
Dear Bob:
Sorry, this is one I was wrong about.
Ron Goldfedder at MOT researched their loco and found that it was No. 9. The proof? A builders plate from No. 9 collected at Rusk, Texas where the loco was used for a while.
J.David


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wrong number
PostPosted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 1:06 pm 

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:25 pm
Posts: 6482
J.David wrote:
Dear Bob:
Sorry, this is one I was wrong about.
Ron Goldfedder at MOT researched their loco and found that it was No. 9. The proof? A builders plate from No. 9 collected at Rusk, Texas where the loco was used for a while.
J.David


J. David -

No problem; you can rectify the error in the NEW edition(s) of "The Steam Locomotive Directory." And when will that be coming out?

Les


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wrong number
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 12:32 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 2:46 pm
Posts: 658
Location: St. Louis, MO
Lake Street #9 managed to keep one of its builder's plates until it arrived in Rusk, TX during WW II. When the museum got the loco the person who helped arrange this also knew who took this plate off the loco. MOT was eventually able to work out a trade. When we restored the engine we found the same builder's bumber stamped on the rods and other parts to confirm it was #9. Now if we could only find the bell, which also came off in Rusk.


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: