It is currently Sun May 18, 2025 3:50 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Standardized Preservation Terminology
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2002 11:59 pm 

I recently developed a simple MS Access database for tracking the preservation status of our collection. (Collections is not my area, but it sounded like fun.) I have grouped our collection into 9 stages of restoration. Here are my divisions and definitions. I am not that happy with them. Can we collectively develop a standard of stages?

Decaying- Exposed completely to the elements without sufficient coating or covering
Arrested Decay- Coated, covered or tarped or housed indoors
Partially Restored Inactive- Restoration has been underway but halted (Got any of those?)
Partially Restored In-Process- Work ongoing toward restoration
Restored Cosmetic- Minimum work completed to make displayable
Restored Static- Complete exterior & interior work but little or no mechanical
Operational- Operational but not too pretty
Restored Out-of-Service- Displayable but currently not yet operational
Restored Running- Completely operational and displayable

I think these catagories are sufficiently broad as to prevent micro-evaluation. We could probably come up with 30 divisions, but that might defeat the "at-a-glance" purpose. Mejor que nada! (Better than nothing!)
What are your impressions?


Orange Empire Railway Museum
wyld@oc-net.com


  
 
 Post subject: Re: Standardized Preservation Terminology
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2002 10:36 pm 

You forgot "restored/operable but not displayed", which describes several pieces out there such as Reading & Northern 425, some stored diesels, many private cars, etc.

lner4472@bcpl.net


  
 
 Post subject: Re: Standardized Preservation Terminology
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2002 5:00 am 

> You forgot "restored/operable but not
> displayed", which describes several
> pieces out there such as Reading &
> Northern 425, some stored diesels, many
> private cars, etc.

I haven't considered whether actually displayed or not as that could change weekly or even daily. The purpose of the report is to give a snapshot of the status of a collection and verify over time if its condition is actually improving or losing ground.


wyld@oc-net.com


  
 
 Post subject: Re: Standardized Preservation Terminology
PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2002 2:09 am 

One other you might keep in mind is something used in ghost town preservation and that is "suspended decay"--the object may look like hell but it will not deteriorate beyond the set point you are at.
No this really shouldn't apply to railroad equipment, but I might have a fun time convincing a collection owner(state agency)of this.

Michael Seitz
Missoula MT

mikefrommontana@juno.com


  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


 Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 275 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: