It is currently Mon May 19, 2025 6:04 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: T&NO 771 to Grapevine
PostPosted: Fri Mar 29, 2002 12:23 pm 

Check out this article posted on the Texas Steam discussion board.

Link to Article
hkading@rypn.org


  
 
 Post subject: Re: T&NO 771 to Grapevine
PostPosted: Fri Mar 29, 2002 12:29 pm 

Sounds interesting . BUT
"Cochran said a Grapevine official told him a spur
could be built to move Old 771 to a special railcar or it could be split into sections and loaded onto a truck to move it. He said Grapevine estimates it will cost about $200,000 to restore the engine to a useable condition."

771 must be in pretty good condition !


lamontdc@adelphia.net


  
 
 Post subject: Re: T&NO 771 to Grapevine
PostPosted: Sat Mar 30, 2002 12:00 am 

> Sounds interesting . BUT
> "Cochran said a Grapevine official told
> him a spur
> could be built to move Old 771 to a special
> railcar or it could be split into sections
> and loaded onto a truck to move it. He said
> Grapevine estimates it will cost about
> $200,000 to restore the engine to a useable
> condition."

> 771 must be in pretty good condition !

It's not. It is in roughly the same mechanical condition as the 786 was when pulled from display in Austin. right now they are having a lot of trouble keeping the left rear driver crown brass from over heating( the axle is blue), so I would question their steam experts' ability to restore a 150ton pre WW1 Harriman mike for 500k, much less 200k.


  
 
 Post subject: Re:2248blue axle
PostPosted: Sat Mar 30, 2002 12:13 am 

> It's not. It is in roughly the same
> mechanical condition as the 786 was when
> pulled from display in Austin. right now
> they are having a lot of trouble keeping the
> left rear driver crown brass from over
> heating( the axle is blue), so I would
> question their steam experts' ability to
> restore a 150ton pre WW1 Harriman mike for
> 500k, much less 200k.

Omitted the overheating axle is under the 75 ton ten wheeler 2248


  
 
 Post subject: Re: T&NO 771 to Grapevine
PostPosted: Sat Mar 30, 2002 3:45 pm 

Supposedly this same engine was rejected by Austin Steam Train as a second locomotive due to condition. One wonders what Grapevine saw in this with their limited knowledge that more informed people have not.

Think there are also questions about bridge loadings, turntable size and curve radius that Grapevine has not considered.

Supposedly the SP 2252 acquisition is a dead issue having been rejected by the curent owners in Roseville, CA.


  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


 Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 102 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: