Railway Preservation News
https://www.rypn.org/forums/

The "New" Saga of #89
https://www.rypn.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=29215
Page 1 of 1

Author:  SteveRG [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 5:47 am ]
Post subject:  The "New" Saga of #89

On The Strasburg Railroad Fan Page on Facebook, someone had posted a comment regarding the sale of Engine #89. He said he was at the RR this past weekend and said there was a For Sale sign in the cab window.
Is there any truth to this at all, was it stuck there momentarily or is someone just playing a cruel joke?

Granted, she is the weakest engine in the fleet as it stands, but she is a remarkably beautiful machine. If they are looking to let her go, WHY?!

Author:  tomgears [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 7:10 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The "New" Saga of #89

Someone probably stuck it there two weeks ago.

Author:  junior [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 9:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The "New" Saga of #89

*bangs head on desk*

C'mon, do you seriously think they would do that, let alone by putting a "For Sale" sign in the Cab window, like some junker auto?

I mean seriously, the people at the SRR are smart enough to know that Craigslist is a much better starting point for selling a loco, right behind Ebay.

Author:  Gary Gray [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The "New" Saga of #89

If that sign showed up on 475, I'm fairly sure we'd be making them an offer..................

Author:  WalterS [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 12:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The "New" Saga of #89

I saw it out on the front lawn at SRR with a for sale sign, right beside the riding lawnmower and boat that they are also selling.

Author:  Anthony C. DeBellis [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The "New" Saga of #89

I really hope this is not a serious topic.

Do we really think the world's premier tourist railroad would place a "For Sale" sign in the cab of an engine to seriosley sell it. I think someone took a joke a little to seriosusly.

All I can say is wow


Anthony

Author:  Bobharbison [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 4:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The "New" Saga of #89

It's only a joke? Ah crap....

Hey Lynn, can you send back that $50 downpayment I mailed you?

Author:  Jeffrey Fefferlyn [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The "New" Saga of #89

Ugh, whomever came up with this scam, let alone believes it seriously needs to get a social life PRONTO!

Author:  SteveRG [ Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The "New" Saga of #89

That's pretty much what I thought...someone in the backshop playing a trick and TRYING to be funny.
Just wanted to verify it, that's all.

Author:  Baldwin feeder [ Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The "New" Saga of #89

SteveRG wrote:
That's pretty much what I thought...someone in the backshop playing a trick and TRYING to be funny.
Just wanted to verify it, that's all.


I think it was fairly funny, especially since somebody believed it. We are in the month of April you know.

Author:  nickbnwd [ Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The "New" Saga of #89

Not to beat a dead horse, but other shortlines [u]have[/u] gone with the "For Sale" sign approach.

Attachments:
File comment: Knox & Kane Alco with "for sale" sign taped to the nose.
kk70 smoking.JPG
kk70 smoking.JPG [ 33.33 KiB | Viewed 5434 times ]

Author:  superheater [ Fri Apr 16, 2010 11:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The "New" Saga of #89

This thread makes me wonder if economist Bryan Caplan's book-"The Myth of the Rational Voter" , could be rewritten about consciousness amongst railfans.

Author:  GSpro [ Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The "New" Saga of #89

Just seems odd if they would take that approach to sell a locomotive. I sure would hope they don't sell her.

Author:  junior [ Sat Apr 17, 2010 10:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The "New" Saga of #89

nickbnwd wrote:
Not to beat a dead horse, but other shortlines have gone with the "For Sale" sign approach.



Ha, a typical ALCO, smokin' awa ....oh, wait, there is a steam loco behind it -nevermind.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/