Railway Preservation News
https://www.rypn.org/forums/

SDRM board recall
https://www.rypn.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=4401
Page 1 of 1

Author:  George Kaplan [ Fri Nov 15, 2002 9:27 pm ]
Post subject:  SDRM board recall

Has the veil of secrecy (gag order) been removed on this situation at SDRM for anyone to comment? It looks like a case study worth other RR museums taking note.

See the Flimsies news story link.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20021115-9999_7m15museum.html

Author:  George Kaplan [ Fri Nov 15, 2002 9:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SDRM board recall

Oops! I see this news was posted earlier.
Nevertheless it's a clarion call to the "Enrons" of the RR museum world to get your house in order before the "stockholders" (members & volunteers) do it for you.

> Has the veil of secrecy (gag order) been
> removed on this situation at SDRM for anyone
> to comment? It looks like a case study worth
> other RR museums taking note.

> See the Flimsies news story link.

Author:  Superheater [ Sat Nov 16, 2002 12:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SDRM board recall-Problem No. 1

>I think the first problem is that there was a 25 member board. Inevitably, a board that size encourages factionalizing-contrary to popular belief more is not always better.

Secondly, in 650 people-maybe 10-15 has the experience to be an effective board member. That means 40-60% was probably the folks that get on boards as rewards for long service.

If this group is smart-they'll find 5-9 folks who have the grey matter and time.



superheater@beer.com

Author:  Steamdome [ Sat Nov 16, 2002 7:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SDRM board recall-Problem No. 1

Huh?! What kind of logic is that?

> Secondly, in 650 people-maybe 10-15 has the
> experience to be an effective board member.
> That means 40-60% was probably the folks
> that get on boards as rewards for long
> service.

> If this group is smart-they'll find 5-9
> folks who have the grey matter and time.

Author:  Roger Thornhill [ Sun Nov 17, 2002 3:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SDRM board recall

I hear another RR museum had a board member and exec. director resign today over the failure to overturn a motion requiring that three board positions be nominated from the membership. They were pushing a full self-perpetuating board which essentially disenfranchied the paying members.

> Has the veil of secrecy (gag order) been
> removed on this situation at SDRM for anyone
> to comment? It looks like a case study worth
> other RR museums taking note.

> See the Flimsies news story link.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/