Railway Preservation News
https://www.rypn.org/forums/

The "Other" CN 2-6-0 *PIC*
https://www.rypn.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=7336		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  Dave Crosby [ Wed Oct 29, 2003 3:49 pm ]
Post subject:  The "Other" CN 2-6-0 *PIC*
Hello All

It appears I chose a good weekend to get out of Scranton. On the day of the Steamtown incident I visited a few friends down at the Middletown and Hummelstown RR and got some fantastic pictures of their ex CN 2-6-0 #91. A great little railroad with some fantastic, friendly employees. Below is a picture of 91 crossing the Swatara Creek on 10/25/2003.

Had a few questions on these engines. I noticed that Strasburg's 89 has draft vents in the side of the firebox where as the 91 does not. Was this a Strasburg modification? A Steamtown modification? I've also noticed that the air reservoir on the 92 at the W&W and the 96 at Ohio Central is located farther back and partially under the cab. Were all the CN 2-6-0's built in the same configuration and then changed by the CN? Or did the modifications come in tourist service?

Just some random questions for the aficionados/operators of these neat little machines.

IÂ’m sure the picture post won't work, but click the link it should come up.

Take Care, Dave Crosby


Middletown & Hummelstown 91
Image
bing@epix.net
Author:  John Stewart [ Wed Oct 29, 2003 5:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The "Other" CN 2-6-0 *PIC*
David;

These really are neat locomotives; too bad more are not running around (or even in parks/museums).

Here is a picture of one at Morrisburg, Ontario.

I'd expect that Strasburg made the firebox mods...

John Stewart
Ottawa, Ontario

Image
freewrl-1@rogers.com
Author:  Dave Crosby [ Wed Oct 29, 2003 5:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The "Other" CN 2-6-0 - Try this Link
Darn Geocities, not sure what the problem is, try and copy then paste the following link into your browser instead.

http://www.geocities.com/scrantonsteam/full/midh91.jpg

I think it works then.

Dave Crosby

Middletown & Hummelstown 91
bing@epix.net
Author:  Richard Jenkins [ Wed Oct 29, 2003 5:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The "Other" CN 2-6-0 - Try this Link
I think the problem is that Geocities won't let you link directly to an image that's being hosted on one of their free accounts, probably because they can't put a pop-up ad in an image file.

You could try putting the image into an HTML page and giving us the link to that page instead.

rjenkins@railfan.net
Author:  L Beckman [ Wed Oct 29, 2003 5:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The "Other" CN 2-6-0 - Try this Link
> Darn Geocities, not sure what the problem
> is, try and copy then paste the following
> link into your browser instead.

>
> http://www.geocities.com/scrantonsteam/full/midh91.jpg

> I think it works then.

> Dave Crosby

Dave:

Thanks for the photo. She doesn't show much smoke in this bridge photo. Did she have a short train?

Les Beckman (HVRM)

midlandblb@cs.com
Author:  Dave Crosby [ Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The "Other" CN 2-6-0 - Try this Link
Hi Les

Actually she runs with a pretty clean stack the times I've seen her, the mark of a seasoned crew. They're heading upgrade at this point so I'm sure they're getting pretty good combustion.

She was hauling 3 DL&W MU cars that time, but I know they've run 4 at times as well.

Dave Crosby

Middletown & Hummelstown 91
bing@epix.net
Author:  Stephen Hussar [ Wed Oct 29, 2003 8:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The "Other" CN 2-6-0 - Try this Link
> I think the problem is that Geocities won't
> let you link directly to an image that's
> being hosted on one of their free accounts,
> probably because they can't put a pop-up ad
> in an image file.

> You could try putting the image into an HTML
> page and giving us the link to that page
> instead.

Could be data transfer limits (per 24 hr period) as well on the free accounts.


SJHussar@aol.com
Author:  Greg Scholl [ Wed Oct 29, 2003 9:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The "Other" CN 2-6-0
#81 was still on display in Palmerston, Ont when I was there in Feb 1987. I just re-edited my "Snow Plow with CN F7's" and put a graphic for the loco as we see it from inside the winged snow plow. Ironic I was working on that the week of the 89 trip at Strasburg, eh!!!!
Good show Strasburg and Craft!
Greg Scholl


sales@gregschollvideo.com
Author:  Rob S [ Wed Oct 29, 2003 10:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Another CN 2-6-0 *PIC*
Another 'sister'! CNR Mogul #86 here in London, Ontario.

Image
Author:  Rob S [ Wed Oct 29, 2003 10:33 pm ]
Post subject:  CNR # 81 Pic *PIC*
Nice red crossheads.

Image
Author:  Rob S [ Wed Oct 29, 2003 11:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Let's try again... *PIC*
Nice red crossheads!!!


Image
Author:  Rob S [ Thu Oct 30, 2003 5:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Another CN 2-6-0 *PIC*
I'm not positive, but I believe this picture was taken in Brandford, Ontario where #96 was stored on an industrial siding for a few years. It is currently in storage at the Ohio Central.


Image
Author:  Greg Scholl [ Thu Oct 30, 2003 8:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Let's try again...
> Nice red crossheads!!!
Didn't look near that good in 1987. No number boards or paint trim back then. Unfortunately there is no more CN or any rails in Palmerston today.
Greg Scholl


sales@gregschollvideo.com
Author:  Joshua K. Blay [ Thu Oct 30, 2003 9:36 am ]
Post subject:  Red Running Gear
The M&H engine in Dave's picture also appears to have a bit of red running gear. What gives?

Joshua

Homepage
joshua@joshuakblay.com
Author:  Dave Crosby [ Thu Oct 30, 2003 3:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Red Running Gear
Interesting point,

While the red on the running gear on the park engine above doesn't seem right, I've seen other CN locomotives with red on the running gear just like the red trimmed main rod on the 91 on the M&H. If I recall correctly, Strasburg's 31 had a red trimmed main rod at one time.

Dave Crosby

bing@epix.net
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/