It is currently Tue Sep 29, 2026 1:39 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Request for Linn Moedinger
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2004 1:25 pm 

> I would love to see #90 or #475 go to Ohio.
> It just has to make economic sense.
Quote from Trainfest Website: "List of Historic Railroad Equipment Scheduled to Attend "TRAIN FEST 2004"

Other locomotives and equipment have been invited. Once they have accepted, they will be added to this list"


Train Fest 2004
huhnkids@adelphia.net


  
 
 Post subject: Re: Southern California Railway Museum at Fullerto
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2004 5:33 pm 

Where is this spur track? I'm assuming that it is not adjacent to the museum? Will it connect to the proposed museum at all?

You say "not regularly used". Does that mean BNSF or UP still owns it and/or is operating on it? Have they agreed, or is this still more daydreaming?

What are you going to operate on it?

> We would not be operating on the
> 'main' line but probably a spur track that
> is not regularly used.

heislerfan@engineer.com


  
 
 Post subject: Re: SV-WP&Y tenders
PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2004 4:50 pm 

Mike,

When the White Pass was really getting back into steam, they contacted us about buying back the two 190 class tenders since we had the originals back from Guatemala. So in the end we traded them the tenders for some freight equipment, I believe the 61 tankcar and such arrived at that time. And to the best of my knowledge the tenders are stored at Carcross with a lot of the rest of the freight car fleet.

Thanks, Taylor

Sumpter Valley Railway
thrush@smt-net.com


  
 
 Post subject: Interchange Etiquette- Suggestion:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 1:08 pm 

I offer the following suggestion to relieve the moderators (as cited by Erik below)

If you think that a post is inappropriate, tell the poster-not the moderator. We are all big kids here-we should all be able take a little peer criticism.

I think most people who post here wish to be heard-and part of that means adapting to the
expectations of the readership. If you complain to the moderators-they post a red "ADMIN"-but you haven't done a thing to explain to the poster what your concerns are OR to hear their counterpoint.

The internet is still a developing media-and it sure has is rough edges (porn, spam, pop ups, spyware, etc) but we have no idea where it will go. Maybe its greatest potential is to relieve us of inerme4iaries and bureacracies just a little. Why impose the dictums of the old order on the new?

If you disagree-my address is above.




superheater@rrmail.com


  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to: