It is currently Fri Aug 21, 2026 9:02 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: San Francisco electric transit
PostPosted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 2:07 pm 

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 3:01 pm
Posts: 1755
Location: SouthEast Pennsylvania
Some sources claim that Hetch Hetchy sells power at the top of the trolley pole, so that overhead wire is not a direct expense of the Municipal Rwy. of San Francisco.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: San Francisco electric transit
PostPosted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 2:30 pm 

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 12:08 pm
Posts: 255
Location: Western Railroad Museum - Rio Vista
I have heard the GM conspiracy told to visitors at trolley museums recently. It just won't die.

The real cause for the death of streetcars was planted when most systems were started. The franchise to the private company called for a five cent fare forever. There also were some financial scams like watered stock involved. The United States had serious inflation during World War I. The five cent fare no longer paid the operating expenses of the operating companies. Before long over half of the operating companies were bankrupt because their franchises prevented raising fares.

President Wilson realized we had a serious problem. He called a conference to solve the problem. The solution was to cancel the five cent fare in the franchises and have fares set by a government body such as a city council. Since politicians now set the fares. they knew would happen at the polls if they raised the fares too much in a service at cost concept. As a result the operating companies were badly under funded for years.

In some cases streetcars were kept operating long after the company wanted to convert to buses simply because the company could not raise money to buy buses. Baltimore is one example.

Gasoline rationing during World War II caused a huge increase in transit ridership. Many cars and lines were totally worn out. After the war city fathers wanted to change to buses because they were considered modern while streetcars were old fashioned. Converting downtown streets to one-way traffic to handle motor vehicles also was resonsible for abandoning some streetcar lines that were not totally worn out.

Back in the streetcar days, downtown was the transit hub. Today, especially in smaller cities, downtown no longer is the hub. Shopping centers and theater multiplexes were built near the outskirts of the city. The old transit patterns no longer worked. Transit became something that was subsidized. Today in many cities farebox revenue is under 50% of operating cost.

Try explaining all this to museum visitors. The GM conspiracy is much easier.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: San Francisco electric transit
PostPosted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 3:04 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 8:28 am
Posts: 2732
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
JimBoylan wrote:
Chicago bought many 2 man rear entrance PCC cars, 3 leaf doors in the rear, 1 leaf in the center, and 2 in the front. They didn't last long.


They lasted just over 10 years, from the day they were delivered by the builder to the day service ended in Chicago in 1958.

_________________
David M. Wilkins

"They love him, gentlemen, and they respect him, not only for himself, for his character, for his integrity and judgment and iron will, but they love him most of all for the enemies he has made."


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: San Francisco electric transit
PostPosted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 3:31 pm 

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:25 pm
Posts: 6482
wilkinsd wrote:
JimBoylan wrote:
Chicago bought many 2 man rear entrance PCC cars, 3 leaf doors in the rear, 1 leaf in the center, and 2 in the front. They didn't last long.


They lasted just over 10 years, from the day they were delivered by the builder to the day service ended in Chicago in 1958.


David -

Yes. Managed to ride them a few times. My first "solo" trip away from home to visit my cousin. After school runs from Fenger High School. A number of times to/from White Sox games. And a less-than-memorable ride when I was in 2nd or 3rd grade when I get sick and threw up on one!

The "Green Hornets" were great cars!

Les


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: San Francisco electric transit
PostPosted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 3:38 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 1:51 pm
Posts: 12150
Location: Somewhere east of Prescott, AZ along the old Santa Fe "Prescott & Eastern"
fkrock wrote:
Try explaining all this to museum visitors. The GM conspiracy is much easier.


So telling people a distorted or biased view of history, or worse an outright lie, is supposed to be OK because it's "easier"????

Again, PLEASE tell me you're kidding.

I don't care if that seems to be the approach our government is taking all too often of late. It's not right for us, supposed historians.

If an American History museum advanced the mindset that American involvement in World War Two came about only because the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, or that it was a Zionist conspiracy against Germany, they would have a lot of further explaining to do.

I think I'll start telling kids we haven't gone to the Moon in recent years because we found it wasn't made of green cheese after all. After all, that's easier, right?


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: San Francisco electric transit
PostPosted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 4:07 pm 

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:07 am
Posts: 328
ADM, he's on your side. He's just saying lazy people choose to tell the conspiracy story because it's easier than having to think.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: San Francisco electric transit
PostPosted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:39 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 1:51 pm
Posts: 12150
Location: Somewhere east of Prescott, AZ along the old Santa Fe "Prescott & Eastern"
And "lazy" people engage in unsafe railroad/shop practices because it's easier than doing things safely.

If they're out there on your railroad or in your museum, they both need to be stopped and "whipped" into proper operating/teaching practices. It doesn't matter of the "GM Conspiracy" fits your personal pro-rail, anti-bus/corporation/etc. agenda or not.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: San Francisco electric transit
PostPosted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 6:07 pm 

Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2013 10:32 am
Posts: 37
wilkinsd wrote:

As laughable as it is, such conspiracy theories are pervasive in popular culture today. I tend to think it is part of our overall educational mission to inform and educate, even on these complex issues. Maybe we can dispel such rubbish in the minds of some visitors.


David, sad to say but even our favorite blog hinted at the relationship in a guest post a couple of months ago. It was a minor point in a long piece so I didn't comment, but the thought is very pervasive.

There is even a discussion on the Brooklyn Historic Railway Association, page blaming NCL/GM for the demise of the streetcar in New York City.

<http://www.brooklynrail.net/info_streetcar.html>.

Al


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: