It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 9:04 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Splitting the Crosshead, k582 Separation of Piston Rod
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2016 9:00 pm 

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 9:34 pm
Posts: 2825
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Once again, RYPN proves its value.

Don't you ever speak unkindly of it again!

_________________
Steven Harrod
Lektor
Danmarks Tekniske Universitet


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Splitting the Crosshead, k582 Separation of Piston Rod
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 5:41 am 

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 9:34 pm
Posts: 2825
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Update. We got it out (30 January). I was not there. Another team that has done this before re-cut the removal wedge for better alignment. He said, "you have to hit it the right way".


Attachments:
IMG_2873.JPG
IMG_2873.JPG [ 89.63 KiB | Viewed 2030 times ]

_________________
Steven Harrod
Lektor
Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Splitting the Crosshead, k582 Separation of Piston Rod
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 7:48 am 

Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 1:37 pm
Posts: 2492
For documentation (and for Becky Morgan's 'best practices' effort) - find out the details of how the wedge is cut "better", and precisely what 'he' means about the right way to hit it.

These details promise to be important in developing a /best practices' record for this very significant but probably underrated aspect.

_________________
R.M.Ellsworth


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Splitting the Crosshead, k582 Separation of Piston Rod
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 9:12 am 

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 9:34 pm
Posts: 2825
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
The slot in the crosshead is not parallel. We failed to consider that in making the inserts. So the whole assembly was binding at first impact.

The slot follows the tapers of the pin. The better extraction tool aligns with this taper, but it is not perfect, as it was guessed at the moment. A new one needs to be made that correctly matches the angles so that there is no binding and impact blows are correctly translated into transverse motion against the piston rod.

_________________
Steven Harrod
Lektor
Danmarks Tekniske Universitet


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


 Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 70000, cumbres, Google [Bot] and 94 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: