It is currently Thu May 01, 2025 12:56 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 83 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: NYC 3001: Is something big coming?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 08, 2024 8:16 am 

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 2:28 pm
Posts: 478
R Paul Carey wrote:
This is sweet speculation!!

I recall, in the 1980s that we (Conrail) did indeed inspect 3001 as a candidate for operation, with Reading Shops the preferred location for the necessary work, then...

The avoidable catastrophe at Dismal Swamp wiped out the ability for any of us to cover these excursions under the terms of commercial insurance.

This enduring hope may yet come to fruition. WOW!!


Just to refresh my memory-what, about 611 and Dismal Swamp, was avoidable? This is an honest question, not a snark.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NYC 3001: Is something big coming?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 08, 2024 8:24 am 

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2021 4:36 pm
Posts: 308
PRR8063 wrote:
Steamguy73 wrote:
hullmat991 wrote:
This is pure speculation, but it appears that this may be a separate organization. So this, in theory, wouldn't necessarily inhibit the many projects FWRHS has, like the steel fleet. And in theory, it shouldn't inhibit 765 from operating in future.


When is 765's next 1472 inspection?

From everything going on with the FWRHS's Indiana Rail Experience, there seems to be a lot of growth which may necessitate a second 'large' locomotive on the roster. Having 3001 up and running before 765's 1472 would allow for the Indiana Rail Experience to carry on with a steam locomotive while 765's inspection takes place.

I agree that it shouldn't inhibit 765's future operations, but rather add to it and potentially draw more people (two steam loco's are better than one as the saying goes, right?)

Overall, very exciting. I praise FWRHS for all their efforts, especially the stuff they have been doing the last few years.


From some searching, it seems like the 765 is due for it's next 1472 in 2032-33, if they get the full 15 years out of it. So that would give them 8 or 9 years to get the 3001 fixed up and running.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NYC 3001: Is something big coming?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 08, 2024 8:30 am 

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2021 4:36 pm
Posts: 308
bigjim4life wrote:
hullmat991 wrote:
Steamguy73 wrote:




Sometimes a smaller locomotive is just what is needed though. Yes it may not be able to haul as much as something larger, but it can travel further to smaller lines. Personally I love the look of something the size of 587 or 624. They look more at home on a short line instead of a Berk or Northern.


This is one of my fears when it comes to something like this. How many "big" locomotives have just been restored, or are actually operational, and have virtually nowhere to run? I'm looking at you, Santa Fe's 3751 and 2926. Milwaukee Road 261 occasionally (once a year or less) runs on the Twin Cities and Western...

Some of the other operational gems or engines returning to service either have lines to run on already or operational opportunities abound. Nashville Steam has the Nashville & Eastern that it's set to run on. K-4 1361 has no shortage of interested railroads in Pennsylvania, I believe. Atlantic Coast Line 1504 has the US Sugar lines to run on. Alaska Railroad has interest and PTC, I believe, installed on the 2-8-0 that's nearly finished in Wasilla.

Yes, people will show up and show out to restore this NYC steamer, if that is indeed the announcement. Hopefully it will run on the Indiana Rail Experience, if nowhere else. But - how many more big steamers do we need running, where they have nowhere to run?


Getting a bit off-topic, but the 2926 situation is somewhat concerning. They fired that engine up back in 2019, so they've used up 6 or 7 years off the boiler ticket and it's run 10 miles, maybe, since then. I also look at the ORHF and have to kind of scratch my head there too. SP 4449 is all dressed up with nowhere to go, and hasn't hauled an excursion in a couple of years now, and yet they're pressing ahead getting SP&S 700 operational as well.

But, FWRHS has the agreement with Indiana Northeastern for the Indiana Rail Experience and that's plenty of room to give a big engine, like an L-3a Mohawk, to operate. Not to mention that they have NYC passenger cars, they're running on ex-NYC tracks, and they now own the ex-NYC depot at Lake Pleasant and use it as the Indiana Rail Experience headquarters.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NYC 3001: Is something big coming?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 08, 2024 8:53 am 

Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 1:37 pm
Posts: 2492
Frankly, if Kelly Lynch is involved with the operation anywhere, I'd expect both competence and success.

And 3001 is a representative locomotive of a type that will never get old to watch, or ride behind.

_________________
R.M.Ellsworth


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NYC 3001: Is something big coming?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 08, 2024 12:37 pm 

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 7:48 am
Posts: 76
In response to John D's question, a number of preventable failures can be culled from the following 4 NTSB Accident Reports (R-87-32, R-87-30-31, R-87-24-29, R-33-37).

The CWR on the Westbound Main Track was laid in winter conditions with insufficient temperature adjustment, and NS failed to maintain an adequate process to impose temperature-related speed restrictions.

The switch at which the derailment had been damaged several weeks earlier by a ballast cleaner with 8 rail brace bolts sheared and not replaced, following which the switch was raised without temperature adjustment.

The Relief Inspector assigned to inspect this trackage had not performed a qualified inspection over a period of 9 YEARS.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NYC 3001: Is something big coming?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 08, 2024 1:07 pm 

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 2:28 pm
Posts: 478
R Paul Carey wrote:
In response to John D's question, a number of preventable failures can be culled from the following 4 NTSB Accident Reports (R-87-32, R-87-30-31, R-87-24-29, R-33-37).

The CWR on the Westbound Main Track was laid in winter conditions with insufficient temperature adjustment, and NS failed to maintain an adequate process to impose temperature-related speed restrictions.

The switch at which the derailment had been damaged several weeks earlier by a ballast cleaner with 8 rail brace bolts sheared and not replaced, following which the switch was raised without temperature adjustment.

The Relief Inspector assigned to inspect this trackage had not performed a qualified inspection over a period of 9 YEARS.


Thank you for the details! Very educational.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NYC 3001: Is something big coming?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 08, 2024 5:46 pm 

Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 2600
R Paul Carey wrote:
The Relief Inspector assigned to inspect this trackage had not performed a qualified inspection over a period of 9 YEARS.

You would expect them to send a roadmaster out there to confirm it was safe for passengers, but maybe the operation had become so routine that they let things slide.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NYC 3001: Is something big coming?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 08, 2024 8:20 pm 

Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 10:08 am
Posts: 720
NJDixon wrote:
Getting a bit off-topic, but the 2926 situation is somewhat concerning. They fired that engine up back in 2019, so they've used up 6 or 7 years off the boiler ticket and it's run 10 miles, maybe, since then.

My recollection is that the first fire up was August 2018 and that the folks in NM started installing tubes in 2926 in January 2015. My very limited understanding is that the 15-year clock begins to toll one year after the first tube goes in, which would be January 2016. By that count, they would have only about six years and three months left. I'd appreciate if someone more well versed in the regulations could correct or confirm. Thank you.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NYC 3001: Is something big coming?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 09, 2024 8:41 am 

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2023 1:55 pm
Posts: 69
It is interesting with 2926, I think clearly they don't have any options to really run it. It's been "almost done" for like 5+ years or so, but seems the updates are always working on something to "finish it". I feel like if they'd be invited to run on the NMDOT track or BNSF etc it'd have been "finished" years ago. But totally get it, very very few opportunities for big steam to run currently. Just look at 4449, 3751, 261, even 1225, etc. Even the current 765 IRE trips, they must have a max speed of like 20-25. Of course great for them to get to do that, but hardly the same as 2102 running 40+ on the R&N.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NYC 3001: Is something big coming?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 09, 2024 9:15 am 

Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 1034
Location: Bucks County, PA
BWills wrote:
Of course great for them to get to do that, but hardly the same as 2102 running 40+ on the R&N.


Even 2102 is used sparingly these days, nowhere near what 425 would be used in a normal year. 425 would be used on various holiday weekends for the Lehigh Gorge Scenic Railway trains, special events like the Schuylkill Haven Borough Days trains, numerous Christmas trains out of Reading Outer Station, and most Fall Foliage trips as well. Whereas 2102 runs for less than 10 days per year. Granted, the lack of a turning facility near Outer Station/Port Clinton REALLY hurts things with regards to trips out of those two locations.

_________________
Big Jim Video Productions
Morrisville, PA

http://www.bigjimvideo.com/home.html
http://www.youtube.com/user/bigjim4life


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NYC 3001: Is something big coming?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 09, 2024 9:38 am 

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2021 4:36 pm
Posts: 308
bigjim4life wrote:
BWills wrote:
Of course great for them to get to do that, but hardly the same as 2102 running 40+ on the R&N.


Even 2102 is used sparingly these days, nowhere near what 425 would be used in a normal year. 425 would be used on various holiday weekends for the Lehigh Gorge Scenic Railway trains, special events like the Schuylkill Haven Borough Days trains, numerous Christmas trains out of Reading Outer Station, and most Fall Foliage trips as well. Whereas 2102 runs for less than 10 days per year. Granted, the lack of a turning facility near Outer Station/Port Clinton REALLY hurts things with regards to trips out of those two locations.


The good news is that at least R&N is working on getting the 425 running again. There are photos coming out of Port Clinton undergoing overhaul, so it's not retired like some people were theorizing. I stumbled across a video I took of the 425 a couple years ago, and was really struck with how much I miss that little blue engine.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NYC 3001: Is something big coming?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 09, 2024 9:41 am 

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2021 4:36 pm
Posts: 308
BWills wrote:
It is interesting with 2926, I think clearly they don't have any options to really run it. It's been "almost done" for like 5+ years or so, but seems the updates are always working on something to "finish it". I feel like if they'd be invited to run on the NMDOT track or BNSF etc it'd have been "finished" years ago.


I believe part of the issue was that they originally installed LeaPTC, the version that piggybacks off of a trailing diesel, then realized that getting a PTC-equipped diesel to trail it could be an issue, so now they're trying to install fully-independent PTC.

"Our newly elected VP, Matt Casford, is working with John Howard to determine the requirements and cost to install a full PTC system on 2926. Although we have the LeapTC system installed, there are difficulties finding host railroads willing to make the required modifications to their locomotives to make the necessary connections. Therefore, we are pursuing this new path."


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NYC 3001: Is something big coming?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 09, 2024 10:47 am 

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 2:28 pm
Posts: 478
R Paul Carey wrote:
In response to John D's question, a number of preventable failures can be culled from the following 4 NTSB Accident Reports (R-87-32, R-87-30-31, R-87-24-29, R-33-37).

The CWR on the Westbound Main Track was laid in winter conditions with insufficient temperature adjustment, and NS failed to maintain an adequate process to impose temperature-related speed restrictions.

The switch at which the derailment had been damaged several weeks earlier by a ballast cleaner with 8 rail brace bolts sheared and not replaced, following which the switch was raised without temperature adjustment.

The Relief Inspector assigned to inspect this trackage had not performed a qualified inspection over a period of 9 YEARS.


I apologize for my ignorance-but was this solely a 611 issue? Or was this an issue regardless of whatever traffic went over this line, and 611 just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time?


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NYC 3001: Is something big coming?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 09, 2024 10:51 am 

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2021 4:36 pm
Posts: 308
And it's official:

" The Fort Wayne Railroad Historical Society announced Wednesday that it had acquired New York Central L-3a “Mohawk” 3001 and planned to restore the 4-8-2 locomotive to operation for use on its popular Indiana Rail Experience excursions.

The 3001 is the largest surviving NYC steam locomotive and the only member of the L3a class to escape the scrapper’s torch. The locomotive was previously owned by the City of Elkhart, Ind., and has been on display at the National New York Central Museum for decades.

FWRHS owns three other steam locomotives, most notably Nickel Plate Road 2-8-4 765, which it has operated since the 1970s. For the last few years, it has managed the Indiana Rail Experience, an excursion operation on the Indiana Northeastern Railroad, which has trackage in Indiana, Ohio and Michigan. Much of that track is former NYC, meaning locomotive 3001 will be right at home. NYC 3001 will also join the fleet of seven Budd streamlined cars built in 1941 for the NYC “Empire State Express” and purchased from Rochester & Genesee Valley Railroad Museum in 2023.

While FWRHS made the announcement on Wednesday, the effort to acquire the locomotive dates back more than a year. The City of Elkhart approved the sale of 3001 in September 2023. Although the transaction was noted in publicly available documents, it was never widely shared. The deal includes locomotive 3001 and tender, plus an auxiliary tender. In return for the locomotive, the National New York Central Museum will receive a cash donation of $20,000; the City of Elkhart will receive help with creating a strategic plan for the future of the museum and its equipment; and the promise that when restored, FWRHS will do its best to bring 3001 back to Elkhart for a visit (although the deal notes that is entirely dependent on the engine being allowed to operate on Class I rails, specifically Norfolk Southern, which runs past the museum).

“We have been the stewards of the Mohawk for many years,” said Elkhart Mayor Rod Roberson in a press release. “Although we have had no shortage of pride and admiration for this historic machine, we lacked the expertise to be able to preserve it in the way it deserves. We are thrilled to be able to announce this partnership and a new life for the Mohawk.”

According to FWRHS, a mechanical evaluation of the locomotive has been performed by FMW Solutions with financial support from former Norfolk Southern CEO Wick Moorman. The group estimates that it will take $4.3 million to restore the locomotive to operation and FWRHS has issued a $100,000 challenge grant with the goal of raising $500,000 by May 3, 2025. Donations can be made online at AmericanLoco.org. FWRHS is also encouraging people to join its pledge list.

“Rather than manage an unknowable ebb and flow of contributions, we encourage backers to join our pledge list,” said FWRHS Executive Director Kelly Lynch. “We are planning pledge drives at the outset to meet our first critical fundraising milestones and to measure the feasibility of fundraising for such a massive project. The effort will not be able to move forward without broad and consistent donor support, which we believe we can forecast from the pledges. As much as this effort may be driven by emotion and history, it has to be driven by data and logic, too.”


“We treat this collaboration and the acquisition of the 3001 with great excitement and seriousness,” Lynch said of the effort to restore the Mohawk. “The locomotive’s future has been uncertain for decades, but with consistent and demonstrated donor support, we believe it can become a major attraction as part of an authentic and immersive experience that will welcome thousands of people from around the world.”

https://railfan.com/new-york-central-4-8-2-mohawk-to-be-restored-to-operation/?fbclid=IwY2xjawFzdvxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHQuZ4tzrKAx4zqsIWlXhgpPSkVD4F7zO6xkujq6tzq1qstAuT6soxpCypg_aem_fW1bHibXxC5pelmsS6DGRA


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NYC 3001: Is something big coming?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 09, 2024 11:52 am 

Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2024 8:18 am
Posts: 5
Location: NE Indiana
Sounds like a big project that will be splashy, but it's a lot of money. Not to mention the group already has multiple other units that could have been restored first, and probably would be better operating for the stuff they're running on the INER.


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 83 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


 Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Crescent-Zephyr, Google [Bot], nedsn3, philip.marshall and 151 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: