I believe the point Mr. Austin is trying to make is that of raising concern over unsafe practices. Target than look into his points as I have people try to shame him. I hope no one else tries to protect the industry.

Tar and feathers for the messenger next?

John

Okay, what [BLEEP]-storm did I miss working out of town all day and evening?

I have asked Wasatch about the repairs in the photos, and I am satisfied with the answers. I have not seen the repairs in person. I created this project, worked on it, am familiar with this boiler, and am now employed as a National Board commissioned boiler inspector, if this offers any credibility to my statement.

The feud mentioned is larger than this discussion board, thus no answer by Wasatch. I will not answer Mr. Austin publicly nor privately, as I am not part of the feud.

Since Randy Hees, our esteemed moderator chose to lock the original thread where this controversy was first raised, and since I strongly agree with Randy's choice to do so, I am going to lock this thread as well.

If you feel the need to create ANOTHER thread to further flog this topic, rest assured that I will not only lock the thread, I will delete the user who creates it. Enough is enough. I would somewhat less than cordially invite those who may disagree with this decision to read a post at the beginning of the Interchange entitled Rant. You really should read it, if you haven't. I meant it then and I mean it now.

Personally, I see little point in continuing the operation of RyPN. It has decayed to the point where it no longer serves its goals. But it continues.