It is currently Thu Aug 20, 2026 11:53 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Layoffs at the Museum of Transportation in St Louis
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 4:34 pm 

Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 11:49 am
Posts: 67
Is it time to try and get the DL&W #952 back from St Louis to Scranton?

From TRAINS Magazine: The Museum of Transportation in St. Louis announced today that staff will be laid off from the museum in anticipation of handing the museum over to the Transport Museum Association on Jan. 1, 2017.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Layoffs at the Museum of TGransportation in St Louis
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 4:46 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 7:25 pm
Posts: 2559
Location: The Atlantic Coast Line
Translation: the City employees are being laid off before becoming employees of the new Association.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Layoffs at the Museum of TGransportation in St Louis
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 4:46 pm 

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 8:18 pm
Posts: 2226
it sounds like the typical jobbing, a technical thing, like a business is going out of business lays off its employees when it closes, but the new replacement business activates and can pick them all up. surely its not a smooth transfer but there ya goes.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Layoffs at the Museum of TGransportation in St Louis
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 5:17 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 8:28 am
Posts: 2732
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
btrw wrote:
Is it time to try and get the DL&W #952 back from St Louis to Scranton?



Why? What does the museum converting from a Saint Louis County Park to a non-profit museum have to do with the 952 returning to Scranton?

_________________
David M. Wilkins

"They love him, gentlemen, and they respect him, not only for himself, for his character, for his integrity and judgment and iron will, but they love him most of all for the enemies he has made."


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Layoffs at the Museum of TGransportation in St Louis
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 5:32 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 5:19 pm
Posts: 2701
Location: Sackets Harbor, NY
The men who were pushing hard to get the 952 returned to Lackawanna territory have lost their zeal for it and I doubt they'll want to mount another campaign to accomplish that.

Their legal action did force the St.Louis management to address the dreadful condition the locomotive had fallen into and do at least a half decent cosmetic redo, so it wasn't all wasted on legal fees.

Even if it were returned to DL&W territory and the funds raised to restore it to service I doubt that the FRA would allow it to operate what with the engineer astride the boiler??

Best left to sleep where she is.

IMHO-Ross Rowland


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Layoffs at the Museum of TGransportation in St Louis
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 6:08 pm 

Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:31 am
Posts: 728
btrw wrote:
Is it time to try and get the DL&W #952 back from St Louis to Scranton?

From TRAINS Magazine: The Museum of Transportation in St. Louis announced today that staff will be laid off from the museum in anticipation of handing the museum over to the Transport Museum Association on Jan. 1, 2017.



Oh my God that is the first thing I thought of when I saw the thread headline on the index page. Hahaha


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Layoffs at the Museum of TGransportation in St Louis
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 6:14 pm 

Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2015 11:24 pm
Posts: 115
This was a very politically motivated move by the County Parks, and I wish the best for the outcome, but it is hard to see a bright future through this. Some very good people I know will be out of work. Very sad for me as a volunteer there.

There was a reason (several of them) that TMA handed the reigns to the County Parks 40 years ago.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Layoffs at the Museum of TGransportation in St Louis
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 8:23 am 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 1325
Location: Pacific, MO
In the bigger picture, this does not bode well for the MOT. I can see a lot of questions arising, other than the political implications.
Myself and many others have donated artifacts, etc, to the MOT directly. If I read the proposal correctly, the TMA will eventually be able to sell them. I purposely did an end run around the TMA.
I think the ways are greased on the slippery slope and I wouldn't count on people being rehired.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Layoffs at the Museum of TGransportation in St Louis
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 2:04 pm 

Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2015 11:24 pm
Posts: 115
As an update: The County parks board will vote on the plan November 29th.

This plan is to lease the entirety of the museum and its assets to the Transport Museum Association (TMA) for a period of 5 years. County will also give TMA $2.5 million to fund the operation of the museum during that time. If the TMA upholds the terms of the lease, on January 1st 2022, the museum will become soley the property of TMA.

The county believes this will save them nearly $1.4 million during the 5 year period. If the plan is passed by the board, all County employees will be laid off Dec. 31st in preparation of handing administration over to TMA on January 1st. I would not count on the county employees being rehired by TMA.

TMA would be allowed to sell assets if the lease is upheld as stated above.


This would rework the way the museum will be managed and operated, and not for the better. This is a VERY poor route for the county to pursue.

(Edit: The vote will be on the 29th, Public discussion on the matter November 22nd.)


Last edited by as12 on Thu Nov 17, 2016 6:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Layoffs at the Museum of Transportation in St Louis
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 2:53 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 5:19 pm
Posts: 2701
Location: Sackets Harbor, NY
A plan along these lines is what I've been proposing for Steamtown NHS. Let the feds hire a DO, give that DO an annual subsidy ( far less than the $ 6 mm they now pay to run the place) and let the private sector DO maximize revenues and minimize expenses. In other words run it as a business.

My guess is that in the case of S'town the results would be remarkable??

IMHO-Ross Rowland


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Layoffs at the Museum of Transportation in St Louis
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 3:45 pm 

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 10:52 pm
Posts: 914
Hi,

I am unfamiliar with an acronym or two.

DO? Direct Officer maybe?

Quote:
the $ 6 mm


The only things of for mm is Mega Millions or millimeter. (maybe 1/1000 times 1/1000 = 1/1,000,000)

I am an electrical engineer (retired), so I am used to:

micro - μ- (m = 1/1,000,000th)
m - milli- (m = 1/1000th)
c - centi- (c = 1/100th)
d - deci- (d = 1/10th)
D - deca- (D = 10 times.
K - kilo- (K = 1000 times)
M - Mega- (M = 1,000,000 times)
G - Giga- (G = 1,000,000,000 times)

$ 6 mm does not make any sense to me. If this is 1 one-millionth of a dollar, then it is might small. Sorry I do not know your lingo.

Thanks.

Doug vV


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Layoffs at the Museum of Transportation in St Louis
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 4:28 pm 

Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 1080
Location: Bucks County, PA
Dougvv wrote:
Quote:
the $ 6 mm


The only things of for mm is Mega Millions or millimeter. (maybe 1/1000 times 1/1000 = 1/1,000,000)

I am an electrical engineer (retired), so I am used to:

micro - μ- (m = 1/1,000,000th)
m - milli- (m = 1/1000th)
c - centi- (c = 1/100th)
d - deci- (d = 1/10th)
D - deca- (D = 10 times.
K - kilo- (K = 1000 times)
M - Mega- (M = 1,000,000 times)
G - Giga- (G = 1,000,000,000 times)

$ 6 mm does not make any sense to me. If this is 1 one-millionth of a dollar, then it is might small. Sorry I do not know your lingo.

Thanks.

Doug vV


The Roman numeral M is often used to indicate one thousand, and MM is used to indicate one million. For example, an expense of $60,000 might appear as $60M. Sales of $3,000,000 might be written as $3MM.

http://www.accountingcoach.com/blog/wha ... -stand-for

_________________
Big Jim Video Productions
Morrisville, PA

http://www.bigjimvideo.com/home.html
http://www.youtube.com/user/bigjim4life


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Layoffs at the Museum of Transportation in St Louis
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 4:38 pm 

Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 2:50 pm
Posts: 2815
Location: Northern Illinois
And I would assume DO is Designated Operator.

_________________
Dennis Storzek


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Layoffs at the Museum of Transportation in St Louis
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 4:42 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 7:19 am
Posts: 6464
Location: southeastern USA
My guess is designated operator or director of operations. If the Feds were to hire him, he would be a federal employee and therefore not private sector, so that plan isn't going to fly. A private contract operator, however..... this strategy has been used at Georgetown Loop since it opened, and seems to be growing in popularity. The extent to which it would be more meritorious than NPS as an operator of a national park is certainly worthy of some discussion, whether legally possible or not. Laws were made to be rewritten.

Partnerships between public sector cultural resources and private nonprofit support organizations is another strategy which has been used, and successfully, in some places.

I think Homer Simpson could never remember if he was a technical supervisor or a supervising technician........

I have always used K for 1000 and M for a million, but I'm a dinosaur.

_________________
“God, the beautiful racket of it all: the sighing and hissing, the rattle and clack of the cars over the rails. These were the sounds that made America the greatest country on earth." Jonathan Evison


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Layoffs at the Museum of Transportation in St Louis
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 5:15 pm 

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 5:10 pm
Posts: 1182
I'm pretty sure Ross meant Designated Operator, which was a term popular in the immediate post-Conrail era for contractors who operated railroad freight service on various branch lines that were not included in the Final System Plan for Conrail. Usually a state entity or a shippers group paid for them to run the trains. They might be known today as Contract Operators.


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: