It is currently Thu May 01, 2025 3:11 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Heritage Railroad vs. Tourist Train
PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2025 6:29 pm 

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 1:15 pm
Posts: 1712
Thinking about the difference between heritage operations in the UK and most of the tourist trains in the USA - what are we trying to accomplish here? "We" as in the greater railway preservation group.

In the UK - many operations are trying to preserve and/or recreate a specific era and the full experience of that era. Multiple trains operating with historic consists, stations and platforms and signaling all coming together to recreate the past.

Here in the states - we often end up with a "tourist train ride" where a tour guide tells jokes and history, often shouting louder and louder to a point where you can't hear the locomotive, clickety clack, etc. Is that what we want? Is that preservation?

Certainly, there are some great examples here in the USA as well - Illinois Railway Museum comes to mind as being the closest to what I've seen in the UK.

I just wonder if we somehow missed the point - and can we correct course?


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heritage Railroad vs. Tourist Train
PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2025 9:38 pm 

Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2022 11:00 pm
Posts: 166
East Broad Top and the Nevada Northern would count towards heritage railroads, the latter would have to be on a technicality as opposed to the former


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heritage Railroad vs. Tourist Train
PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2025 11:41 pm 

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 1:15 pm
Posts: 1712
Daylight25 wrote:
East Broad Top and the Nevada Northern would count towards heritage railroads, the latter would have to be on a technicality as opposed to the former


why do you say "on a technicality"?


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heritage Railroad vs. Tourist Train
PostPosted: Thu May 01, 2025 11:26 am 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 5:55 pm
Posts: 1071
Location: Warren, PA
We have every manner of 'heritage' depending on how you interpret it, from the best to the least.

But the bottom line remains survival, you can't live on museum admissions, even a decent heritage railroad usually needs some professional staff, and cash flow is cash flow, so that's the conflict.

I'd say that 75% of everybody (if not higher) is surviving on special events, Thomas, Polar (and-or Christmas) that have little to do with 'heritage' but keep things moving.

The bigger question is how the UK operations successfully manage their capital and operational funding.

State or national supported operations are great, until the day politics change.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heritage Railroad vs. Tourist Train
PostPosted: Thu May 01, 2025 12:02 pm 

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 1:15 pm
Posts: 1712
I really can't think of any operation in the USA that is an equivalent of the UK heritage operations like Bluebell, Severn Valley, Great Central, etc.

There are, of course, some truly fantastic operations in the USA that probably don't have a UK equivalent either.

Many operations in the UK also have Thomas, Christmas, and other special events. I'm certainly not saying we shouldn't have those events as they can bring in lots of attention and new customers. I do think the best possible scenario is when those events can happen and align with the historical nature of the operation - Strasburg's Christmas Tree train is a great example of this. But that's another thought.

My point is more about the overall mission, plan, and vibe of an operation.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heritage Railroad vs. Tourist Train
PostPosted: Thu May 01, 2025 12:13 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 10:39 pm
Posts: 28
Special events are one thing, day to day operations being sold as history and heritage are another. Sometimes you need to let standards slide to pay the bills.

"Heritage Railroad" seems to be a word that has taken off in the US in the past decade or so, borrowed from the UK. Before that we were tourist trains, steam trains, old trains, etc.

In my mind, a good heritage road works to tell some sort of story with their pieces, to either demonstrate what passenger travel was like X years ago, or what freight trains looked like X years ago. However, it doesn't just stop there. The crew should be properly attired, stations and public facilities are suitably "dressed" for the era. There is an element of living history, if you will.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9eY_eoXs3g

After having ridden many of the notable Heritage Railways in the UK (Severn Valley, North Yorkshire Moors, Great Central, Mid Hants) and a number of Western US (Western Railway Museum, Niles, Mount Rainier, Northwest RR Museum, Cal Western), the US lines do not compare in quality of a historical attraction. Don't get me wrong, these are all fine operations.

Of those, I enjoyed Western Railway Museum the most, even though I am not a big Interurban fan. Their cars are very well restored, their track is nice, and the return leg I think we were pushing upwards of 25-30 mph, so it felt like we were actually moving at a decent clip and not plodding along at 10mph.

Of all of these US roads, I found the crew etiquette to be the most distracting. Mismatched uniforms, radio mics clipped onto vests, radio volume turned up too high inside cars, using radios to communicate every little piece of information to a person a car away, assorted railroad pins and doo dads, mountain man beards, etc. Did I mention radios? Get rid of the speaker mic and stick the radio on your belt, under your coat. You're running a 3 car train at 10 mph, not flat switching a 100 car freight train. A little bit of dress up and play acting would go a long way.

Finally, when your open cars and snack cars are in better condition than the historic or heritage equipment in your fleet, is that part of a good heritage road?

On the opposite end, an industrial critter pulling a gondola and LIRR commuter in PA is not heritage in my view, as it does not attempt to tell a story of how any of this equipment operated, or how things were. Might be very good at showing Joe Public what it was like to be a piece of scrap metal in a Gondola. Yes, many railroads started out like this, but decades later, many have failed to move beyond this initial step. Fine and good for people that want to play trains or simply ride a train, but a true "heritage railroad"? Not to me. As I am wont to say, old =/= historic.

These are the ramblings of an un-fun stickler, so take that for what you will.

As an aside, there was a reality show made on the NYMR pre-pandemic called Yorkshire Steam Railway. It gives a good (if slightly dramatic) look at running a large UK steam road. What caught me was in the summer months, they run up to 17 trains a day, with a couple on the National Network to Whitby. It is available on youtube.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heritage Railroad vs. Tourist Train
PostPosted: Thu May 01, 2025 12:40 pm 

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2021 8:55 am
Posts: 27
Heritage Railroad

Trains operating have Historical Significance to the area it ran on with as Original Equipment as Possible. Exceptions to this would be buying or Building of New Rolling Stock to save Historic Equipment.

My Example: East Broad Top Railroad

Tourist Railroad:

Trains operating over a length of track, Foreign to the Area. Built purely for Tourism or Theme Park. Including a Mix-Match of different Equipment from different roads and Era's

My Example: Tweetsie or Dollywood

I only used Narrow Guage as my examples

the Standard Gauge routes are more Difficult to Define

Example: The Western Maryland Scenic.
- Yes, it is Original WM Trackage (mostly)
- No, it is Using C&O 1309, which would have never been in cumberland or Frostburg during normal operations. 734 was orginally on the LS&I

Example: The Everett Railroad
- Started as Tourist and Freight in Everett PA
- No Longer in Everett, PA
- Operates B&H 11 and Owns H&BT 38 (partial Parent Company "KINDA")

The Bigger Question is where would Strasburg Fall in this, Is it Heritage or is it Tourist?

it is a Valid Discussion with no correct way to Diagnose what this is or what it should be. No Way to Correctly Define it with out Pissing off everyone in one fashion or another.

thanks


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Heritage Railroad vs. Tourist Train
PostPosted: Thu May 01, 2025 12:56 pm 

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 1:15 pm
Posts: 1712
"The Bigger Question is where would Strasburg Fall in this, Is it Heritage or is it Tourist?"

For my definition in my original post... Strasburg is much closer to the UK Heritage Railroads than most operations in the USA.

From Wikipedia -
"A heritage railway or heritage railroad (U.S. usage) is a railway operated as living history to re-create or preserve railway scenes of the past. Heritage railways are often old railway lines preserved in a state depicting a period (or periods) in the history of rail transport."

That's kind of the definition I'm using. The history of the equipment in relation to the right of way is not part of the definition for this topic. If that is the definition - I believe Ely wins hands down for the USA correct?


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


 Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bigjim4life, wesp and 145 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: