It is currently Thu Oct 01, 2026 11:03 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: B&O Museum on ballot in Baltimore
PostPosted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:45 pm 

Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 2:19 pm
Posts: 1124
Location: Washington, D.C.
Ted Miles wrote:
Can you post a report about this money for the museum? How did the vote go?

Ted Miles


It passed, 69% to 30%.

"Question N
Bond Issue

B&O Railroad Museum
Ordinance No. 04-711 to authorize the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore to borrow up to $1,000,000 to be used for the acquisition of land or property; and the construction, erection, renovation, alteration, reconstruction, installation, improvement and repair of new or existing buildings, structures, or facilities to be used by or in connection with the B&O Railroad Museum; and for the equipping of any and all existing and new buildings, structures, and facilities authorized to be constructed, renovated, altered or improved by the Ordinance; and for doing all things necessary, proper or expedient in connection therewith. "

_________________
Erik Ledbetter
www.steamsafari.com


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: B&O Museum on ballot in Baltimore
PostPosted: Fri Nov 05, 2004 1:20 pm 

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 1:05 am
Posts: 1140
Location: San Francisco
Erik,

Well at last, some good news out of the election.

We had a historic preservation bond issue here in San Francisco county and it failed 64 % yes to 36% no. It needed at least 66%. Would have worked on brick building like the Union Iron Works (built railroad equipment) and the
car barn for the San Francisco and San Mateo Steet Railway (first electric line) when most of city was cable powered.

Ted Miles


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 05, 2004 6:12 pm 

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 10:29 am
Posts: 401
Location: Scranton, PA
Florida voted down the high-speed rail system that they'd previously voted to build. It was the right vote, unfortunately, because there was never a viable plan for the line to be profitable, and just building it would have been a TREMENDOUS expense to we taxpayers.


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to: